Fragments of a Commentary on the Tattvasaṅgraha, Part 2
From Buddha-Nature
< Articles
(Created page with "{{Article |ArticleLayout=Academic Layout |ArticleTitle=Fragments of a Commentary on the Tattvasaṅgraha, Part 2 |PubDate=2012 |DisableDropcap=No }}") |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|ArticleTitle=Fragments of a Commentary on the Tattvasaṅgraha, Part 2 | |ArticleTitle=Fragments of a Commentary on the Tattvasaṅgraha, Part 2 | ||
|PubDate=2012 | |PubDate=2012 | ||
| + | |ArticleSummary=This is part 2 of a report on the fragments of hitherto unknown commentary on the Tattvasańgraha.<ref>For general introduction to the fragments, see Harimoto & Kano 2008.</ref> The folio we report on here, photographed in frames 32 (recto) and 33 top (verso), constitutes a part of the commentary on Tattvasańgraha stanzas 177–181. Tis is where various arguments for the existence of ''ātman'' is presented.<br> Here, we give the tex of the Tattvasańgraha along with the Tattvasańgrahapañjikā in full. Unlike in the previous fragment, our commentary is brief, and due to its fragmentary nature, it is hard to understand. Having the Tattvasańgrahapañjikā next to our text greatly helps in reconstructing and understanding our text. (Harimoto and Kano, introduction, 5) | ||
|DisableDropcap=No | |DisableDropcap=No | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:42, 27 April 2020
Fragments of a Commentary on the Tattvasaṅgraha, Part 2
Article
Article
| Citation: | Harimoto, Kengo, and Kazuo Kano. "Fragments of a Commentary on the Tattvasaṅgraha, Part 2." Journal of the Nepal Research Centre 14 (2012) 5–17. |
|---|
Article Summary
This is part 2 of a report on the fragments of hitherto unknown commentary on the Tattvasańgraha.[1] The folio we report on here, photographed in frames 32 (recto) and 33 top (verso), constitutes a part of the commentary on Tattvasańgraha stanzas 177–181. Tis is where various arguments for the existence of ātman is presented.
Here, we give the tex of the Tattvasańgraha along with the Tattvasańgrahapañjikā in full. Unlike in the previous fragment, our commentary is brief, and due to its fragmentary nature, it is hard to understand. Having the Tattvasańgrahapañjikā next to our text greatly helps in reconstructing and understanding our text. (Harimoto and Kano, introduction, 5)
Here, we give the tex of the Tattvasańgraha along with the Tattvasańgrahapañjikā in full. Unlike in the previous fragment, our commentary is brief, and due to its fragmentary nature, it is hard to understand. Having the Tattvasańgrahapañjikā next to our text greatly helps in reconstructing and understanding our text. (Harimoto and Kano, introduction, 5)
