Non-representational Language in Mipam's Representation of Other-emptiness

From Buddha-Nature

< Articles

Revision as of 15:40, 18 March 2020 by AlexC (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
LibraryArticlesNon-representational Language in Mipam's Representation of Other-emptiness

Non-representational Language in Mipam's Re-presentation of Other-emptiness
Article
Article
Citation: Duckworth, Douglas S. "Non-representational Language in Mipam's Re-presentation of Other-emptiness." Philosophy East and West 64, no. 4 (2014): 920–32. https://sites.temple.edu/duckworth/files/2013/07/NonRepresentational_duckworth.pdf.

Buddhist traditions understand emptiness in various ways, and two streams of interpretation, “self-emptiness” (rang stong) and “other-emptiness” (gzhan stong), have emerged in Tibet that help bring into focus the extent to which interpretations diverge.[1] In contrast to self-emptiness, other-emptiness does not refer to a phenomenon’s lack of its own essence; it refers to the ultimate reality’s lack of all that it is not. Rather than claiming the universality of self-emptiness (emptiness as lack of own essence), proponents of other-emptiness assert another way to understand emptiness with regard to the ultimate (emptiness as ultimate ground). These two interpretations of emptiness—as ground and as groundless abyss—reveal a rift at the foundation of Buddhist metaphysics.
      This essay probes the discourses of other-emptiness in the Jonang (jo nang) and Nyingma (rnying ma) traditions. After briefly introducing other-emptiness in the Jonang tradition, the locus classicus for other-emptiness in Tibet, I will contrast the way Mipam (‘ju mi pham rgya mtsho) (1846–1912) positions the discourse of other-emptiness in his interpretative system. I will then demonstrate how Mipam’s portrayal of other-emptiness highlights the way he uses a perspectival means to incorporate a diversity of seemingly contradictory claims that he uses to support his view of ultimate reality as indeterminate. I will argue that an implication of his view is a non-representational account of language about the ultimate. (Duckworth, introduction, 920)

References

  • Bötrül (bod sprul mdo sngags bstan pa'i nyi ma) (1898–1959). Collected Works (bod sprul mdo sngags bstan pa'i nyi ma'i gsung 'bum). 3 vols. Sichuan: Nationalities Press, 2004.
  • _____. Distinguishing the Views and Philosophies: A Lamp of Essential Points (lta grub shan 'byed gnad kyi sgron me). In Bötrül, Collected Works, vol. 1, pp. 1–51.
  • _____. Distinguishing the Views and Philosophies: Illuminating Emptiness in a Twentieth-Century Tibetan Buddhist Classic. Translated, annotated, and introduced by Douglas Duckworth. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2011.
  • _____. Ornament of Mañjughoṣa’s Viewpoint: An Explanation of the Words and Meanings of "Distinguishing the Views and Philosophies: A Lamp of Essential Points" (lta grub shan 'byed gnad kyi sgron me'i tshig don rnam bshad 'jam dbyangs dgongs rgyan). In Bötrül, Collected Works, vol. 1, pp. 53–259.
  • Dölpopa (dol po pa shes rab rgyal mtshan) (1292–1361). The Categories of the Possible and the Impossible (srid mi srid kyi rab dbye dbu phyogs legs par bzhugs so). In Collected Works, 'dzam thang ed., vol. 6, pp. 305–316.
  • _____. The Mountain Doctrine: Ocean of Definitive Meaning (ri chos nges don rgya mtsho). Gangtok: Dodrup Sangyey Lama, 1976.
  • Duckworth, Douglas. Mipam on Buddha-Nature. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2008.
  • Ferrer, Jorge. "Spiritual Knowing as Participatory Enaction." In The Participatory Turn: Spirituality, Mysticism, Religious Studies, edited by Jorge Ferrer and Jacob Sherman, pp. 135–169. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2008.
  • Longchenpa (klong chen rab ‘byams) (1308–1364). Seven Treasuries (mdzod bdun). 7 vols. Edited by Tarthang Tulku. Included within this work are the following:
  • _____. Precious Treasury of Philosophies (theg pa mtha' dag gi don gsal bar byed pa grub mtha' rin po che'i mdzod).
  • _____. Precious Treasury of the Expanse of Phenomena (chos dbyings rin po che'i mdzod).
  • _____. Precious Treasury of the Supreme Vehicle (theg pa'i mchog rin po che'i mdzod), vols. 1–2.
  • _____. Precious Treasury of Words and Meanings (gsang ba bla na med pa 'od gsal rdo rje snying po'i gnas gsum gsal bar byed pa'i tshig don rin po che'i mdzod).
  • _____. Treasure Trove of Scriptural Transmission: Auto-Commentary of the Precious Treasury of the Expanse of Phenomena (chos dbyings rin po che'i mdzod kyi 'grel ba lung gi gter mdzod).
  • _____. White Lotus: Auto-Commentary of the Precious Wish-Fulfilling Treasury (theg pa chen po'i man ngag gi bstan bcos yid bzhin rin po che'i mdzod kyi 'grel pa padma dkar po).
  • Mipam ('ju mi pham rgya mtsho) (1846–1912). Beacon of Certainty (nges shes sgron me). Published in nges shes sgron me rtsa 'grel, pp. 1–54. Sichuan: Nationalities Press, 1997.
  • _____. Collected Works (Dilgo Khyentsé's expanded redaction of sde dge edition). Kathmandu: Zhechen Monastery, 1987.
  • _____. Commentary on the Wisdom Chapter of the Bodhicaryāvatāra (spyod 'jug sher 'grel ke ta ka). Sichuan: Nationalities Press, 1993.
  • _____. Difficult Points of Scriptures in General (dbu ma sogs gzhung spyi'i dka' gnad skor gyi gsung sgros sna tshogs phyogs gcig tu bsdus pa rin po che'i za ma tog). In Mipam, Collected Works, vol. 22, pp. 427–710.
  • _____. Intelligent Presence (gnyug sems 'od gsal ba'i don la dpyad pa rdzogs pa chen po gzhi lam 'gras bu'i shan 'byed blo gros snang ba). In Mipam, Collected Works, vol. 24, pp. 411–566.
  • _____. Lion's Roar: Exposition of Buddha-Nature (bde gshegs snying po'i stong thun chen mo seng ge'i nga ro). In Mipam, Collected Works, vol. 4 (pa), 563–607.
  • _____. Precious Vajra Garland (gnyug sems zur dpyad skor gyi gsung sgros thor bu rnams phyogs gcig tu bsdus pa rdo rje rin po che'i phreng ba). In Mipam, Collected Works, vol. 24, pp. 567–774.
  • _____. Vajra Essence (gnyug sems 'od gsal ba'i don rgyal ba rig 'dzin brgyud pa'i lung bzhin brjod pa rdo rje snying po). In Mipam, Collected Works, vol. 24, pp. 353–410.
  • Phuntsho, Karma. Mipham's Dialectics and the Debates on Emptiness. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2005.
  • Ricoeur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1976.
  • Stearns, Cyrus. The Buddha from Dolpo: A Study of the Life and Thought of the Tibetan Master Sherab Gyaltsen. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.
  1. 1 In this article I use the THL Simplified Phonetic Transcription of Standard Tibetan, developed by David Germano and Nicolas Tournadre, to transcribe Tibetan words into English.