Post-23

From Buddha-Nature
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
The commentary provides a concise summary of the two interpretations of the topic of buddha-nature in Tibet. He writes:
 
The commentary provides a concise summary of the two interpretations of the topic of buddha-nature in Tibet. He writes:
{{QuoteIndent
+
:In identifying the nature of buddha-nature, in Tibet, there are diverse assertions. The lamas of the Gaden tradition claim that the emptiness of the mind being empty of hypostatic existence, which is a nonimplicative negation, is buddha-nature. The lamas of the Sakya tradition hold that the unity of emptiness and clarity of the mind is buddha-nature. The lord Rangjung Dorje has taught:
|In identifying the nature of buddha-nature, in Tibet, there are diverse assertions. The lamas of the Gaden tradition claim that the emptiness of the mind being empty of hypostatic existence, which is a nonimplicative negation, is buddha-nature. The lamas of the Sakya tradition hold that the unity of emptiness and clarity of the mind is buddha-nature. The lord Rangjung Dorje has taught:|}}
 
 
:This ordinary consciousness itself
 
:This ordinary consciousness itself
 
:Is the sphere of reality, the buddha-nature.
 
:Is the sphere of reality, the buddha-nature.
 
:It can neither be made better by enlightened beings
 
:It can neither be made better by enlightened beings
:Nor sullied to become worse by sentient beings.}}
+
:Nor sullied to become worse by sentient beings.
 +
}}
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 11:33, 19 March 2021

Tashi Ozer's Commentary on the Ratnagotravibhāga[edit]

[[ |300px|thumb| ]] Dumowa Tashi Ozer is one of the articulate Kagyupa commentators on the Ratnagotravibhāga. He received an education in the Geluk and Sakya traditions but is most significantly associated with the two most scholarly Karmapas as a student of the 7th Karmapa, Chötra Gyatso, and a teacher of the 8th Karmapa, Mikyö Dorje. Tashi Ozer's commentary was primarily based on the topical outline written by the 3rd Karmapa, Rangjung Dorje.

The commentary provides a concise summary of the two interpretations of the topic of buddha-nature in Tibet. He writes:

In identifying the nature of buddha-nature, in Tibet, there are diverse assertions. The lamas of the Gaden tradition claim that the emptiness of the mind being empty of hypostatic existence, which is a nonimplicative negation, is buddha-nature. The lamas of the Sakya tradition hold that the unity of emptiness and clarity of the mind is buddha-nature. The lord Rangjung Dorje has taught:
This ordinary consciousness itself
Is the sphere of reality, the buddha-nature.
It can neither be made better by enlightened beings
Nor sullied to become worse by sentient beings.

Weekly quote[edit]

 
~

}}