How Insentient Beings Expound Dharma (Okumura 2023)

{{Article
|ArticleLayout=Alternate Source
|ArticleTitle=How Insentient Beings Expound Dharma (Okumura 2023)
|TileDescription=Shohaku Okumura explains the connection between non-sentient beings and buddhanature.
|AlternateSourceLink=https://www.lionsroar.com/how-insentient-beings-expound-dharma/
|AlternateSourceLogo=File:BuddhaDharma-logo-lg-tag.png
|PubDate=2023
|ArticleContent=The concept of buddhanature (''bussho''), as interchangeable with ''tathagatagarbha'' (womb or embryo of ''tathagata''; "one who has thus come," an epithet of the Buddha), arose in Mahayana Buddhism after Nagarjuna (second to third century CE) and before Vasubandhu (fourth to fifth century CE). Sutras from this period are considered middle Mahayana sutras. Before the development of the Mahayana, people generally did not believe they could become buddhas, but some Mahayana Buddhists began to teach that any one of us can become a bodhisattva—a buddha-to-be—if we arouse ''bodhicitta'' (awakening mind), take bodhisattva vows, receive bodhisattva precepts, and practice the six paramitas (generosity, discipline, patience, exertion, meditation, and wisdom). 

However, probably because they observed themselves and the conditions of the samsaric world—in which so many are self-centered, competitive, in conflict, and have hatred for each other—they needed to instill some faith that buddhahood was within reach. Even if the people of the world were deluded, their minds defiled with the three poisons, they could eventually reach buddhahood if they continued to practice the Buddha's teachings. 

They developed the concept of buddhanature—that is, the pure undefiled mind as the essential self-nature, hidden and covered as it may be thanks to our deluded, discriminative minds. According to those middle Mahayana sutras, buddhanature is permanent, without change, whether in deluded living beings or in enlightened buddhas. It continues to exist, life after life, until buddhahood is reached, no matter how long it might take. Some people criticized this theory, arguing that buddhanature sounded like ''atman,'' the permanent self that Shakyamuni had negated. 

In India, others argued that all living beings have buddhanature, or that some do, but that especially deluded people, called ''icchantika'', lacked it. In the later part of the ''Nirvana Sutra'' (second century CE), it is said that all living beings, without exception, have buddhanature. This idea heavily influenced almost all traditions of Chinese Buddhism. Some Chinese Buddhists, including the ancestors of today’s Zen practitioners, further maintained that not only sentient beings but also nonsentient beings, have buddhanature. ([https://www.lionsroar.com/how-insentient-beings-expound-dharma/ Read more here])
|DisableDropcap=No
|PostToAudioStream=No
}}