Verse II.37
m (Text replacement - "།(.*)།" to "$1། །") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
}}{{VerseVariation | }}{{VerseVariation | ||
|VariationLanguage=Tibetan | |VariationLanguage=Tibetan | ||
− | |VariationOriginal= | + | |VariationOriginal=དེ་གཟུགས་མེད་ཕྱིར་བལྟར་མེད་དེ། །<br>མཚན་མ་མེད་ཕྱིར་གཟུང་དུ་མེད། །<br>དགེ་བ་རང་བཞིན་དག་པའི་ཕྱིར། །<br>དྲི་མེད་དྲི་མ་སྤངས་ཕྱིར་རོ། ། |
|VariationOriginalSource=[https://adarsha.dharma-treasure.org/kdbs/degetengyur/pbs/2916182 Dege, PHI, 126] | |VariationOriginalSource=[https://adarsha.dharma-treasure.org/kdbs/degetengyur/pbs/2916182 Dege, PHI, 126] | ||
|VariationTrans=It is invisible because it has no form.<br>It is ungraspable since it has no characteristics.<br>It is splendid because it is pure by nature.<br>It is stainless because the stains are eliminated. | |VariationTrans=It is invisible because it has no form.<br>It is ungraspable since it has no characteristics.<br>It is splendid because it is pure by nature.<br>It is stainless because the stains are eliminated. | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
::'''It is splendid because it is pure by nature'''. | ::'''It is splendid because it is pure by nature'''. | ||
::'''It is stainless because the stains are eliminated'''. II.37 | ::'''It is stainless because the stains are eliminated'''. II.37 | ||
+ | |OtherTranslations=<h6>Obermiller (1931) <ref>Obermiller, E. "The Sublime Science of the Great Vehicle to Salvation Being a Manual of Buddhist Monism." Acta Orientalia IX (1931), pp. 81-306.</ref></h6> | ||
+ | :Being immaterial, it is not perceptible, | ||
+ | :And, as it has no real characteristic marks, | ||
+ | :It cannot be cognized by inference. | ||
+ | :It is sublime, being perfectly pure by nature, | ||
+ | :And free from every stain through the complete removal of defilement. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h6>Takasaki (1966) <ref>Takasaki, Jikido. [[A Study on the Ratnagotravibhāga (Uttaratantra): Being a Treatise on the Tathāgatagarbha Theory of Mahāyāna Buddhism]]. Serie Orientale Roma 33. Roma: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente (ISMEO), 1966.</ref></h6> | ||
+ | :Being immaterial, it cannot be perceived, | ||
+ | :And being of no [visible] mark, it is 'incognizable'; | ||
+ | :It is 'pure' since it is pure by nature, | ||
+ | :And is ' immaculate ' because of its removal of pollutions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h6>Fuchs (2000) <ref>Fuchs, Rosemarie, trans. Buddha Nature: The Mahayana Uttaratantra Shastra. Commentary by Jamgon Kongtrul and explanations by Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso. Ithaca, N. Y.: Snow Lion Publications, 2000.</ref></h6> | ||
+ | :Since it is not something visible, it cannot be seen. | ||
+ | :Since it is free from features, it cannot be grasped. | ||
+ | :It is virtuous, [the dharmadhatu] being by nature pure, | ||
+ | :and it is free from stains, since pollution is abandoned. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 12:15, 18 August 2020
Verse II.37 Variations
शुभं प्रकृतिशुद्धत्वादमलं मलहानितः
śubhaṃ prakṛtiśuddhatvādamalaṃ malahānitaḥ
མཚན་མ་མེད་ཕྱིར་གཟུང་དུ་མེད། །
དགེ་བ་རང་བཞིན་དག་པའི་ཕྱིར། །
དྲི་མེད་དྲི་མ་སྤངས་ཕྱིར་རོ། །
It is ungraspable since it has no characteristics.
It is splendid because it is pure by nature.
It is stainless because the stains are eliminated.
- [L’Éveil] est invisible parce qu’il n’a pas de forme ;
- Insaisissable parce qu’il n’a pas de caractéristiques ;
- Vertueux parce qu’il est pur par nature ;
- Immaculé parce qu’il n’a plus de souillures.
RGVV Commentary on Verse II.37
Tibetan
English
Sanskrit
Chinese
Full Tibetan Commentary
Full English Commentary
Full Sanskrit Commentary
Full Chinese Commentary
Other English translations[edit]
Obermiller (1931) [7]
- Being immaterial, it is not perceptible,
- And, as it has no real characteristic marks,
- It cannot be cognized by inference.
- It is sublime, being perfectly pure by nature,
- And free from every stain through the complete removal of defilement.
Takasaki (1966) [8]
- Being immaterial, it cannot be perceived,
- And being of no [visible] mark, it is 'incognizable';
- It is 'pure' since it is pure by nature,
- And is ' immaculate ' because of its removal of pollutions.
Fuchs (2000) [9]
- Since it is not something visible, it cannot be seen.
- Since it is free from features, it cannot be grasped.
- It is virtuous, [the dharmadhatu] being by nature pure,
- and it is free from stains, since pollution is abandoned.
Textual sources[edit]
Commentaries on this verse[edit]
Academic notes[edit]
- Digital Sanskrit Buddhist Canon Unicode Input
- Digital Sanskrit Buddhist Canon Unicode Input
- Brunnhölzl, Karl. When the Clouds Part: The Uttaratantra and its Meditative Tradition as a Bridge between Sūtra and Tantra. Boston: Snow Lion Publications, an imprint of Shambhala Publications, 2014.
- VT (fol. 14r6) glosses "the three wisdoms" as "those of study, reflection, and meditation" and "people with wisdom" as "śrāvakas, pratyekabuddhas, and bodhisattvas."
- VT (fol. 14r7) glosses °madhya° as °sthāna°, while Takasaki suggests the reading °sudma° instead of °madhya° (DP khyim).
- Skt. mṛdukarmaṇyabhāvāt. DP read "since it is nondual and workable" (gnyis med las su rung ba’i phyir).
- Obermiller, E. "The Sublime Science of the Great Vehicle to Salvation Being a Manual of Buddhist Monism." Acta Orientalia IX (1931), pp. 81-306.
- Takasaki, Jikido. A Study on the Ratnagotravibhāga (Uttaratantra): Being a Treatise on the Tathāgatagarbha Theory of Mahāyāna Buddhism. Serie Orientale Roma 33. Roma: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente (ISMEO), 1966.
- Fuchs, Rosemarie, trans. Buddha Nature: The Mahayana Uttaratantra Shastra. Commentary by Jamgon Kongtrul and explanations by Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso. Ithaca, N. Y.: Snow Lion Publications, 2000.