A Note on Ratnagotravibhāga I.52 + Bhagavadgītā XIII.32

From Buddha-Nature

< Articles

LibraryArticlesA Note on Ratnagotravibhāga I.52 + Bhagavadgītā XIII.32

Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Here the first line is identical with the uniform version of the Bhagavadgītā (Bh. G.); the second line, however, contains a significant variant, which deserves to be closely examined. Instead of ''sattve tathāyam'' (Johnston's ed.) in Ratna., the Bh. G. reads ''dehe tathātma'' ( according to the critical text, accepted by the B.O.R.I., Poona, 1945).
 
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Here the first line is identical with the uniform version of the Bhagavadgītā (Bh. G.); the second line, however, contains a significant variant, which deserves to be closely examined. Instead of ''sattve tathāyam'' (Johnston's ed.) in Ratna., the Bh. G. reads ''dehe tathātma'' ( according to the critical text, accepted by the B.O.R.I., Poona, 1945).
 +
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The fact noted by Johnston (''op. cit.'' p. x), viz., that we have in the Ratna. a certain number of ''kārikās'' supplemented by other verses, either explaining them in detail or illustrating them by similes from the sūtra literature, combined with the commentator's characterization of the main text as a 'ślokārthasaṃgraha', makes it probable, that the above stanza was taken by the author,—the somewhat mysterious Maitreyanātha to whom the work has been attributed,—from some Buddhist canonical source. We find the meaning of this stanza couched in different phraseologies in R,atna. I. 49 (p. 41) and again in another stanza quoted from an older source by the commentator while explaining I. 146–147 (p. 71). We therefore need not assume here any direct borrowal from a non-Buddhistic source like the Bh. G.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 13:29, 19 March 2020

A Note on Ratnagotravibhāga I.52 = Bhagavadgītā XIII.32
Article
Article
Citation: Gokhale, Vasudeva Vishnunath. "A Note on Ratnagotravibhāga I.52 = Bhagavadgītā XIII.32." In Studies in Indology and Buddhology: Presented in Honour of Professor Susumu Yamaguchi on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday, edited by Gadjin Nagao, 90–91. Kyoto: Hozokan, 1955.

The problem concerning the exact relationship between Buddhism and the early Vedānta has by no means been yet solved. In the Foreword to his edition of The Ratnagotravibhāga Mahāyanottaratantraśāstra ( Patna, 1950), Johnston has pointed out the close parallelism existing between the Tathāgatagarbha theory, propounded therein at great length, and the ātman theories of the Gauḍapādakārikā and other Vedantic works (p. xii). In this connection, I may call special attention to the stanza : Ratna. I. 52, whose identification with Bhagavadgītā XIII. 32, perhaps yet unnoticed, may throw some additional light on the subject. This stanza in Ratna. (p. 42) runs as follows:

yathā sarvagataṃ saukṣmyād ākāśaṃ nopalipyate /
sarvatrāvasthitaḥ sattve tathāyaṃ nopalipyate // (I. 52)

      Here the first line is identical with the uniform version of the Bhagavadgītā (Bh. G.); the second line, however, contains a significant variant, which deserves to be closely examined. Instead of sattve tathāyam (Johnston's ed.) in Ratna., the Bh. G. reads dehe tathātma ( according to the critical text, accepted by the B.O.R.I., Poona, 1945).       The fact noted by Johnston (op. cit. p. x), viz., that we have in the Ratna. a certain number of kārikās supplemented by other verses, either explaining them in detail or illustrating them by similes from the sūtra literature, combined with the commentator's characterization of the main text as a 'ślokārthasaṃgraha', makes it probable, that the above stanza was taken by the author,—the somewhat mysterious Maitreyanātha to whom the work has been attributed,—from some Buddhist canonical source. We find the meaning of this stanza couched in different phraseologies in R,atna. I. 49 (p. 41) and again in another stanza quoted from an older source by the commentator while explaining I. 146–147 (p. 71). We therefore need not assume here any direct borrowal from a non-Buddhistic source like the Bh. G.

<ul><li>Property "BuNayTopicTags" (as page type) with input value "{{#arraymap:Ratnagotravibhāga Mahāyānottaratantraśāstra" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.</li> <!--br--><li>Property "BuNayTopicTags" (as page type) with input value "The doctrine of buddha-nature in Indian Buddhism|" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.</li> <!--br--><li>Property "BuNayTopicTags" (as page type) with input value "|@@@|@@@|" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.</li> <!--br--><li>Property "BuNayTopicTags" (as page type) with input value "}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.</li></ul>{{#arraymap:Library Items;Articles;;;{{#arraymap:Gokhale, V.

|; |@@@ |@@@ |; }};Hozokan;; ; |; |@@@ | | }}