ExternalData New Method
((by SublimeText.Mediawiker)) |
((by SublimeText.Mediawiker)) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
'''Function:''' | '''Function:''' | ||
− | <pre>{{#external_value: | + | <pre>{{#external_value:Description|source=https://research.tsadra.org/index.php?title=Special%3AAsk&q={{urlencode:[[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]]}}&po=Description&p[format]=csv|format=CSV with header}}</pre> |
'''Result:''' | '''Result:''' | ||
− | {{#external_value: | + | {{#external_value:Description|source=https://research.tsadra.org/index.php?title=Special%3AAsk&q={{urlencode:[[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]]}}&po=Description&p[format]=csv|format=CSV with header}} |
❌ | ❌ |
Revision as of 13:07, 5 December 2022
Simple Value from DRL[edit]
Value on DRL:
A Direct Path to the Buddha Within
Function:
{{#external_value:BuNayTitle|source=https://research.tsadra.org/index.php?title=Special%3AAsk&q={{urlencode:[[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]]}}&po=BuNayTitle&p[format]=csv|format=CSV with header}}
Result:
A Direct Path to the Buddha Within
✅
Complex Value from DRL[edit]
Value on DRL:
#[['gos lo tsA ba gzhon nu dpal]]. [[Theg pa chen po rgyud bla ma'i bstan bcos kyi 'grel bshad de kho na nyid rab tu gsal ba'i me long]]. In ''[['Gos Lo tsā ba gZhon nu dpal's Commentary on the Ratnagotravibhāgavyākhyā]]''. Nepal Research Centre Publications, 24. Edited by Klaus-Dieter Mathes. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2003.
Function:
{{#external_value:Description|source=https://research.tsadra.org/index.php?title=Special%3AAsk&q={{urlencode:[[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]]}}&po=Description&p[format]=csv|format=CSV with header}}
Result:
Maitreya’s Ratnagotravibhāga, also known as the Uttaratantra, is the main Indian treatise on buddha nature, a concept that is heavily debated in Tibetan Buddhist philosophy. In A Direct Path to the Buddha Within, Klaus-Dieter Mathes looks at a pivotal Tibetan commentary on this text by Gö Lotsāwa Zhönu Pal, best known as the author of the Blue Annals. Gö Lotsāwa, whose teachers spanned the spectrum of Tibetan schools, developed a highly nuanced understanding of buddha nature, tying it in with mainstream Mahāyāna thought while avoiding contested aspects of the so-called empty-of-other (zhentong) approach. In addition to translating key portions of Gö Lotsāwa's commentary, Mathes provides an in-depth historical context, evaluating Gö’s position against those of other Kagyü, Nyingma, and Jonang masters and examining how Gö Lotsāwa’s view affects his understanding of the buddha qualities, the concept of emptiness, and the practice of mahāmudrā. (Source: Wisdom Publications)
❌