Property:PosAnalyticMeditNotes
From Buddha-Nature
This is a property of type Text.
&
B
Though he differed from Ngok on certain issues, he was more in line with his approach than that of Tsen Khawoche. +
C
Chapa was clearly a participant in the ''rngog lugs''.
*"These two traditions of ''rngog'' and ''btsan'' were respectively called the "analytical tradition" (''thos bsam gyi lugs'') and "meditative tradition" (''sgom lugs'')." [[Kano. K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 242.
*"The lineage through Ngog Lotsāwa is often called "the exegetical tradition of the dharma works of Maitreya" (''byams chos bshad lugs''), while Dsen Kawoché’s transmissions represent "the meditative tradition of the dharma works of Maitreya" (''byams chos sgom lugs'')." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 123.
*Wangchuk's wording of this is confusing or perhaps mistaken, see [[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 8. +
Though perhaps not explicitly fitting into this category, Kano states,
*"His understanding of Buddha-nature is compatible with that of the tradition of bTsan Kha-bo-che, which defines Buddha-nature as the “natural luminous mind,” and also in accordance with Dol-po-pa’s stance, which sees the Buddha-nature teaching being echoed in tantric literature." [[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 342.
*And, "...it is obvious that bCom-ldan-ral-gri does not follow rNgog’s reasoning that leads to identifying Buddha-nature with emptiness." [[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 316. +
G
"That Zhönu Pal comments on the Ratnagotravibhāga from within the tradition of meditation is also clear from his colophon:
The Dharma master Drigungpa [Jigten Sumgön] rejoiced in Jé Gampopas statement that the basic text of these mahāmudrā instructions of ours is the [Ratnagotravibhāga] Mahāyānottaratantraśāstra composed by the illustrious Maitreya; and since it is evident that the notes to [his] Uttaratantra explanations, the points he makes when presenting the three dharmacakras, and also the explanations deriving from Sajjana’s heart disciple Tsen Kawoché, are [all] in accordance with mahāmudrā proper, I have relied on them and have made [this] clear to others as best as I could. (DRSM, 574.9-12)" [[Mathes, K.]], ''[[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]]'', p. 368. +
K
"Furthermore, the Third Karmapa composed a summary of the ''Uttaratantra'' in accordance with the meditative tradition, which establishes the ''Uttaratantra'' as a definitive text included in the last wheel of the Buddha's teachings." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', pp. 30-31. +
M
The lineage included within his work on the ''Uttaratantra'' passes through Ngok and others who upheld his tradition.
See [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 309. +
N
"These two traditions of rngog and btsan were respectively called the "analytical tradition" (''thos bsam gyi lugs'') and "meditative tradition" (''sgom lugs'')."[[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 242. +
T
*"These two traditions of rngog and btsan were respectively called the "analytical tradition" (''thos bsam gyi lugs'') and "meditative tradition" (''sgom lugs'')." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 242
*"The lineage through Ngog Lotsāwa is often called "the exegetical tradition of the dharma works of Maitreya" (''byams chos bshad lugs''), while Dsen Kawoché’s transmissions represent "the meditative tradition of the dharma works of Maitreya" (''byams chos sgom lugs'')." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 123.
+
It is based on the tradition of Tsen Kawoché. +
Rngog is the ''de facto'' founder of the analytic tradition of exegesis in Tibet. +
Source: , , pages 290-295. +
