- Abstractii
- Lists of Chartsxi
- Abbreviationsxii
- Acknowledgementsxiii
- INTRODUCTION1
- 1. The Origin of the Problem: Taehyŏn and the Difficulty of Determining His Yogācāra Doctrinal Position1
- 2. Traditional Bifurcations of East Asian Yogācāra Buddhism and Their
Problems9- (1) "Old" Yogācāra Buddhism vs. "New" Yogācāra Buddhism; Paramārtha vs. Xuanzang9
- (2) Tathāgatagarbha Theory vs. Yogācāra Theory; One Vehicle vs. Three Vehicles14
- (3) Dharma Nature school vs. Dharma Characteristics school18
- 3. Outline of Chapters21
- CHAPTER I. The Initial Stage of the Old Yogācāra Tradition24
- 1. Two Directions in the Initial Stage of Old Yogācāra Tradition24
- 2. The Northern and Southern Dilun Schools and Their Interpretations of Ālayavijñāna27
- 3. Comparison of Tathāgatagarbha Doctrine in the Four and Ten-Fascicle Laṅkāvatārasūtra35
- 4. Concluding Remarks41
- CHAPTER II. "Old" Yogācāra: Two Strands of the Shelun School42
- 1. Issues42
- 2. Distinction between Paramārtha's and Tanqian's Shelun Lineages 47
- (1) Two Types of Synthesis of Tathāgatagarbha and Yogācāra47
- (2) Reconsideration of Paramārtha’s Doctrine of Amalavijñāna52
- (3) Two Types of Interpretations of the Nature of Realization: Perfect Enlightenment and Potential Enlightenment63
- (4) Connection between the Unconditioned and Conditioned I: The
Duality of Thusness71 - (5) Connection between the Unconditioned and Conditioned II: Two
Types of Attainment of the Dharma Body77 - (6) Connection between the Unconditioned and Conditioned III: The Connection between the Nature of Realization and the Buddha
Bodies80 - (7) Disappearance of the Distinction between the Two Shelun Strands86
- 3. Development of Paramārtha’s Shelun Lineage88
- 4. Concluding Remarks102
- CHAPTER III. Emergence of Antagonism between the "Old" and "New"
Yogācāra104- 1. Transmission of the "New" Buddhist Literature and Doctrinal
Diversity104 - 2. Problems in Interpreting the New Yogācāra as the Dharma Characteristics School107
- 3. Ji’s Yogācāra Position I: Antagonism towards the One Vehicle and
Bhāvaviveka121- (1) Background: Outbreak of the Buddha Nature Controversy and the Emptiness-Existence Controversy123
- (2) New Yogācāra Doctrinal Positions Derived from the Eight-
Consciousness System in Comparison with the Tathāgatagarbha
Position128 - (3) The Doctrine of Uncontaminated Seeds and Criticism of Bhāvaviveka:
Ji’s Response to the Two Controversies133
- 4. Ji’s Yogācāra Position II: Embracing One Vehicle Thought and Bhāvaviveka’s Madhyamaka139
- (1) Background: Translation of the Mahāprajñāpāramitāsūtra and its
Influence on the Two Controversies140 - (2) Embracing One Vehicle Thought and Bhāvaviveka’s Madhyamaka144
- (3) Two Types of Buddha Nature: Ji’s Theoretical Basis for Embracing the Universal Buddha Nature150
- (4) Separation between the Unconditioned and Conditioned Realms: Ji’s Doctrinal Limitation154
- (1) Background: Translation of the Mahāprajñāpāramitāsūtra and its
- 5. Concluding Remarks160
- 1. Transmission of the "New" Buddhist Literature and Doctrinal
- CHAPTER IV. Synthesis of the "Old" and "New" Yogācāra Systems: Wŏnhyo and Fazang's Interpretations of the Awakening of Faith161
- 1. Social Background and the Emergence of the Awakening of Faith161
- 2. Wŏnhyo and Fazang’s Compromises between Madhyamaka and Yogācāra
and the Differences in their Perspectives166- (1) Wŏnhyo's Binary Perspective166
- (2) Fazang's Hierarchical Synthesis178
- (3) Concluding Remarks188
- 3. Significance of Wŏnhyo and Fazang's distinct interpretations of the AMF
in the East Asian Yogācāra Tradition189- (1) Wŏnhyo as a Successor of Paramārtha189
- (2) Fazang: Origin of the Teaching of Dependent Origination from the Tathāgatagarbha196
- 4. Concluding Remarks201
- CHAPTER V. Synthesis of the One Vehicle and the Three Vehicles: Taehyŏn's Interpretation of the AMF, the Sūtra of Brahmā's Net, and the Cheng weishi lun 203
- 1. Taehyŏn's Yogācāra Thought from a New Perspective203
- 2. Taehyŏn's Yogācāra Thought in the Taesŭng kisillon naeŭi yakt’amgi205
- (1) Balanced Perspective toward the One Vehicle and the Three
Vehicles205 - (2) Binary Perspective on the Buddha Nature I: Distinction between the Original Awakening and the Nature of Realization210
- (1) Balanced Perspective toward the One Vehicle and the Three
- 3. Taehyŏn's View on Buddhist Precepts Represented in the Pŏmmanggyŏng kojŏkki214
- (1) Balanced View toward the Śrāvaka Precepts and the Bodhisattva
Precepts214 - (2) Binary Perspective on the Buddha Nature II: Universal Buddha Nature
as the Cause221
- (1) Balanced View toward the Śrāvaka Precepts and the Bodhisattva
- 4. Taehyŏn’s Response to the Emptiness-Existence Controversy Represented
in the Sŏng yusik non hakki224- (1) Taehyŏn's Position on the Emptiness-Existence Controversy and Its Significance224
- (2) Binary Perspective on the Innate Uncontaminated Seeds: Coexistence
of the Doctrines of Five Distinct Lineages and the Universal Gotra229
- 5. Concluding Remarks235
- CONCLUSION237
- Bibliography242