Toward a New Paradigm of East Asian Yogācāra Buddhism: Taehyŏn (ca. 8th Century CE), a Korean Yogācāra Monk, and His Predecessors

From Buddha-Nature
LibraryDissertationsToward a New Paradigm of East Asian Yogācāra Buddhism: Taehyŏn (ca. 8th Century CE), a Korean Yogācāra Monk, and His Predecessors
< Books
(Redirected from Toward a New Paradigm of East Asian Yogācāra Buddhism: Taehyŏn (ca. 8th Century CE), a Korean Yogācāra Monk, and His Predecessors)



Toward a New Paradigm of East Asian Yogācāra Buddhism: Taehyŏn (ca. 8th Century CE), a Korean Yogācāra Monk, and His Predecessors
Dissertation
Dissertation

Abstract

This dissertation seeks to locate the place of Taehyŏn 大賢(ca. 8th century CE), a Silla Korean Yogācāra monk, within the broader East Asian Buddhist tradition. My task is not confined solely to a narrow study of Taehyŏn’s thought and career, but is principally concerned with understanding the wider contours of the East Asian Yogācāra tradition itself and how these contours are reflected in Taehyŏn’s extant oeuvre. There are problems in determining Taehyŏn's doctrinal position within the traditional paradigms of East Asian Yogācāra tradition, that is, the bifurcations of Tathāgatagarbha and Yogācāra; Old and New Yogācāra; the One Vehicle and Three Vehicles; and the Dharma Nature and Dharma Characteristics schools. Taehyŏn's extant works contain doctrines drawn from across these various divides, and his doctrinal positions therefore do not precisely fit any of these traditional paradigms. In order to address this issue, this dissertation examines how these bifurcations originated and evolved over time, across the geographical expanse of the East Asian Yogācāra tradition. The chapters of the dissertation discuss in largely chronological order the theoretical problems involved in these bifurcations within Yogācāra and proposes possible resolutions to these problems, by focusing on the works of such major Buddhist exegetes as Paramārtha (499-569), Ji 基 (632-682), Wŏnhyo 元曉 (617-686), Fazang 法藏(643-712), and, finally, Taehyŏn.

Citation Lee, Sumi. "Toward a New Paradigm of East Asian Yogācāra Buddhism: Taehyŏn (ca. 8th Century CE), a Korean Yogācāra Monk, and His Predecessors." PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles, 2014. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/74h5d0nv#main.


  • Abstractii
  • Lists of Chartsxi
  • Abbreviationsxii
  • Acknowledgementsxiii
  • INTRODUCTION1
    • 1. The Origin of the Problem: Taehyŏn and the Difficulty of Determining His Yogācāra Doctrinal Position1
    • 2. Traditional Bifurcations of East Asian Yogācāra Buddhism and Their
      Problems
      9
      • (1) "Old" Yogācāra Buddhism vs. "New" Yogācāra Buddhism; Paramārtha vs. Xuanzang9
      • (2) Tathāgatagarbha Theory vs. Yogācāra Theory; One Vehicle vs. Three Vehicles14
      • (3) Dharma Nature school vs. Dharma Characteristics school18
    • 3. Outline of Chapters21
  • CHAPTER II. "Old" Yogācāra: Two Strands of the Shelun School42
    • 1. Issues42
    • 2. Distinction between Paramārtha's and Tanqian's Shelun Lineages 47
      • (1) Two Types of Synthesis of Tathāgatagarbha and Yogācāra47
      • (2) Reconsideration of Paramārtha’s Doctrine of Amalavijñāna52
      • (3) Two Types of Interpretations of the Nature of Realization: Perfect Enlightenment and Potential Enlightenment63
      • (4) Connection between the Unconditioned and Conditioned I: The
        Duality of Thusness
        71
      • (5) Connection between the Unconditioned and Conditioned II: Two
        Types of Attainment of the Dharma Body
        77
      • (6) Connection between the Unconditioned and Conditioned III: The Connection between the Nature of Realization and the Buddha
        Bodies
        80
      • (7) Disappearance of the Distinction between the Two Shelun Strands86
    • 3. Development of Paramārtha’s Shelun Lineage88
    • 4. Concluding Remarks102
  • CHAPTER III. Emergence of Antagonism between the "Old" and "New"
    Yogācāra
    104
    • 1. Transmission of the "New" Buddhist Literature and Doctrinal
      Diversity
      104
    • 2. Problems in Interpreting the New Yogācāra as the Dharma Characteristics School107
    • 3. Ji’s Yogācāra Position I: Antagonism towards the One Vehicle and
      Bhāvaviveka
      121
      • (1) Background: Outbreak of the Buddha Nature Controversy and the Emptiness-Existence Controversy123
      • (2) New Yogācāra Doctrinal Positions Derived from the Eight-
        Consciousness System in Comparison with the Tathāgatagarbha
        Position
        128
      • (3) The Doctrine of Uncontaminated Seeds and Criticism of Bhāvaviveka:
        Ji’s Response to the Two Controversies
        133
    • 4. Ji’s Yogācāra Position II: Embracing One Vehicle Thought and Bhāvaviveka’s Madhyamaka139
      • (1) Background: Translation of the Mahāprajñāpāramitāsūtra and its
        Influence on the Two Controversies
        140
      • (2) Embracing One Vehicle Thought and Bhāvaviveka’s Madhyamaka144
      • (3) Two Types of Buddha Nature: Ji’s Theoretical Basis for Embracing the Universal Buddha Nature150
      • (4) Separation between the Unconditioned and Conditioned Realms: Ji’s Doctrinal Limitation154
    • 5. Concluding Remarks160
  • CHAPTER IV. Synthesis of the "Old" and "New" Yogācāra Systems: Wŏnhyo and Fazang's Interpretations of the Awakening of Faith161
    • 1. Social Background and the Emergence of the Awakening of Faith161
    • 2. Wŏnhyo and Fazang’s Compromises between Madhyamaka and Yogācāra
      and the Differences in their Perspectives
      166
      • (1) Wŏnhyo's Binary Perspective166
      • (2) Fazang's Hierarchical Synthesis178
      • (3) Concluding Remarks188
    • 3. Significance of Wŏnhyo and Fazang's distinct interpretations of the AMF
      in the East Asian Yogācāra Tradition
      189
      • (1) Wŏnhyo as a Successor of Paramārtha189
      • (2) Fazang: Origin of the Teaching of Dependent Origination from the Tathāgatagarbha196
      • 4. Concluding Remarks201
  • CHAPTER V. Synthesis of the One Vehicle and the Three Vehicles: Taehyŏn's Interpretation of the AMF, the Sūtra of Brahmā's Net, and the Cheng weishi lun 203
    • 1. Taehyŏn's Yogācāra Thought from a New Perspective203
    • 2. Taehyŏn's Yogācāra Thought in the Taesŭng kisillon naeŭi yakt’amgi205
      • (1) Balanced Perspective toward the One Vehicle and the Three
        Vehicles
        205
      • (2) Binary Perspective on the Buddha Nature I: Distinction between the Original Awakening and the Nature of Realization210
    • 3. Taehyŏn's View on Buddhist Precepts Represented in the Pŏmmanggyŏng kojŏkki214
      • (1) Balanced View toward the Śrāvaka Precepts and the Bodhisattva
        Precepts
        214
      • (2) Binary Perspective on the Buddha Nature II: Universal Buddha Nature
        as the Cause
        221
    • 4. Taehyŏn’s Response to the Emptiness-Existence Controversy Represented
      in the Sŏng yusik non hakki
      224
      • (1) Taehyŏn's Position on the Emptiness-Existence Controversy and Its Significance224
      • (2) Binary Perspective on the Innate Uncontaminated Seeds: Coexistence
        of the Doctrines of Five Distinct Lineages and the Universal Gotra
        229
    • 5. Concluding Remarks235
  • CONCLUSION237
  • Bibliography242