A Study on the Ratnagotravibhāga (Uttaratantra)

From Buddha-Nature

< Books

LibraryBooksA Study on the Ratnagotravibhāga (Uttaratantra)

Line 109: Line 109:
 
****{{i|7) The Pure and Impure State of the Bodhisattva in comparison with the Ordinary Being and the Buddha|253}}
 
****{{i|7) The Pure and Impure State of the Bodhisattva in comparison with the Ordinary Being and the Buddha|253}}
 
***{{i|(C) Unchangeability in the Perfectly Pure State|256}}
 
***{{i|(C) Unchangeability in the Perfectly Pure State|256}}
 +
**{{i|(X) ''Asaṃbheda''|258}}
 +
***{{i|1) Synonyms of the Essence of the Tathāgata|259}}
 +
***{{i|2) The Point: Buddhahood is Nirvāṇa|261}}
 +
***{{i|3) The Parable of Painters|263}}
 +
***{{i|4) Similarity of the Buddhahood to the Sun|265}}
 +
 +
*{{i|IX. The 9 Illustrations on the Germ covered with Defilements|268}}
 +
***{{i|1) The 9 Illustrations according to the Tathāgatagarbhasūtra|268}}
 +
***{{i|2) 9 Kinds of Defilements — the Impurities of the Mind|277}}
 +
***{{i|3) Concordance between the 9 Illustrations and 9 Kinds of Defilements|281}}
 +
***{{i|4) The threefold Nature of the Essence|283}}
 +
****{{i|a) ''Dharmakāya''|284}}
 +
****{{i|b) ''Tathatā''|287}}
 +
****{{i|c) ''Tathāgatagotra''|288}}
  
  

Revision as of 16:52, 11 August 2020

A Study on the Ratnagotravibhāga (Uttaratantra)
Book
Book

Jikido Takasaki's seminal work on the Ratnagotravibhāga includes a critical introduction, a synopsis of the text, a translation from the original Sanskrit text in comparison with its Tibetan and Chinese versions, critical notes, appendixes, and indexes. The work is split into two parts. The first consists of a critical and detailed study on the structure of the text and the position of the Ratnagotravibhāga in Mahāyāna Buddhism, and the second consists of a translation of the Sanskrit text into English.

Citation Takasaki, Jikidō. A Study on the Ratnagotravibhāga (Uttaratantra): Being a Treatise on the Tathāgatagarbha Theory of Mahāyāna Buddhism. Serie Orientale Roma XXXIII. Rome: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente (IsMEO), 1966. https://archive.org/details/bdrc-W1KG1582/page/n1/mode/2up.