|
|
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| | |AuthorAffiliation=Temple University | | |AuthorAffiliation=Temple University |
| | |PubDate=2014 | | |PubDate=2014 |
| − | |ArticleContent=Buddhist traditions understand emptiness in various ways, and two streams of interpretation, “self-emptiness” (''rang stong'') and “other-emptiness” (''gzhan stong''), have emerged in Tibet that help bring into focus the extent to which interpretations diverge.<ref>1 In this article I use the THL Simplified Phonetic Transcription of Standard Tibetan, developed by David Germano and Nicolas Tournadre, to transcribe Tibetan words into English.</ref> In contrast to self-emptiness, other-emptiness does not refer to a phenomenon’s lack of its own essence; it refers to the ultimate reality’s lack of all that it is not. Rather than claiming the universality of self-emptiness (emptiness as lack of own essence), proponents of other-emptiness assert another way to understand emptiness | + | |ArticleContent=Buddhist traditions understand emptiness in various ways, and two streams of interpretation, “self-emptiness” (''rang stong'') and “other-emptiness” (''gzhan stong''), have emerged in Tibet that help bring into focus the extent to which interpretations diverge.<ref>1 In this article I use the THL Simplified Phonetic Transcription of Standard Tibetan, developed by David Germano and Nicolas Tournadre, to transcribe Tibetan words into English.</ref> In contrast to self-emptiness, other-emptiness does not refer to a phenomenon’s lack of its own essence; it refers to the ultimate reality’s lack of all that it is not. Rather than claiming the universality of self-emptiness (emptiness as lack of own essence), proponents of other-emptiness assert another way to understand emptiness with regard to the ultimate (emptiness as ultimate ground). These two interpretations of emptiness—as ground and as groundless abyss—reveal a rift at the foundation of Buddhist metaphysics. |
| − | with regard to the ultimate (emptiness as ultimate ground). These two interpretations of emptiness—as ground and as groundless abyss—reveal a rift at the foundation of Buddhist metaphysics. | |
| | | | |
| − | This essay probes the discourses of other-emptiness in the Jonang (''jo nang'') and | + | This essay probes the discourses of other-emptiness in the Jonang (''jo nang'') and Nyingma (''rnying ma'') traditions. After briefly introducing other-emptiness in the Jonang tradition, the ''locus classicus'' for other-emptiness in Tibet, I will contrast the way Mipam (‘ju mi pham rgya mtsho) (1846–1912) positions the discourse of other-emptiness in his interpretative system. I will then demonstrate how Mipam’s portrayal of other-emptiness highlights the way he uses a perspectival means to incorporate a diversity of seemingly contradictory claims that he uses to support his view of ultimate reality as indeterminate. I will argue that an implication of his view is a non-representational account of language about the ultimate. |
| − | Nyingma (''rnying ma'') traditions. After briefly introducing other-emptiness in the | |
| − | Jonang tradition, the ''locus classicus'' for other-emptiness in Tibet, I will contrast the way Mipam (‘ju mi pham rgya mtsho) (1846–1912) positions the discourse of other-emptiness in his interpretative system. I will then demonstrate how Mipam’s | |
| − | portrayal of other-emptiness highlights the way he uses a perspectival means to incorporate a diversity of seemingly contradictory claims that he uses to support his view of ultimate reality as indeterminate. I will argue that an implication of his view is a non-representational account of language about the ultimate. | |
| | }} | | }} |
