Mahāmudrā and the Middle Way

From Buddha-Nature

< Books

LibraryBooksMahāmudrā and the Middle Way

Line 34: Line 34:
 
** {{i|Navigating the Middle Ways|29}}
 
** {{i|Navigating the Middle Ways|29}}
 
** {{i|The Nature of Liberating Knowledge|41}}
 
** {{i|The Nature of Liberating Knowledge|41}}
* {{i|Shākya mchog ldan|44}}
+
 
 +
* {{i|'''Shākya mchog ldan'''|44}}
 
** {{i|Shākya mchog ldan and the Bka’ brgyud Mahāmudrā Tradition|45}}
 
** {{i|Shākya mchog ldan and the Bka’ brgyud Mahāmudrā Tradition|45}}
 
** {{i|Life, Writings and Influences|51}}
 
** {{i|Life, Writings and Influences|51}}
 
** {{i|Madhyamaka and the Dialectic of Emptiness: Rang stong and<br>Gzhan stong|57}}
 
** {{i|Madhyamaka and the Dialectic of Emptiness: Rang stong and<br>Gzhan stong|57}}
*** {{i|The Three Natures (trisvabhāva)|65}}
+
*** {{i|The Three Natures (''trisvabhāva'')|65}}
*** {{i|The Two Truths (satyadvaya)|67}}
+
*** {{i|The Two Truths (''satyadvaya'')|67}}
 
** {{i|Mahāmudrā and Buddha Nature|74}}
 
** {{i|Mahāmudrā and Buddha Nature|74}}
 
** {{i|Direct Perception and Nondual Wisdom|101}}
 
** {{i|Direct Perception and Nondual Wisdom|101}}
** {{i|The Great Seal in Shākya mchog ldan’s Mahāmudrā trilogy|109}}
+
** {{i|The Great Seal in Shākya mchog ldan's Mahāmudrā trilogy|109}}
 
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā: What it is and What it is Not|109}}
 
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā: What it is and What it is Not|109}}
 
*** {{i|Madhyamaka, Mantrayāna and Mahāmudrā|116}}
 
*** {{i|Madhyamaka, Mantrayāna and Mahāmudrā|116}}
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā and What Remains (lhag ma : avasista)|121}}
+
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā and What Remains (''lhag ma'' : ''avaśiṣṭa'')|121}}
 
*** {{i|The Problem of Cessation|124}}
 
*** {{i|The Problem of Cessation|124}}
 
*** {{i|Contested Methods of Realization|127}}
 
*** {{i|Contested Methods of Realization|127}}
** {{i|Responses to Sa skya Pandita’s Criticism of Bka’ brgyud Mahāmudrā|131}}
+
** {{i|Responses to Sa skya Paṇḍita’s Criticism of Bka’ brgyud Mahāmudrā|131}}
 
*** {{i|A Philosophical Defence and Justification of Mahāmudrā|131}}
 
*** {{i|A Philosophical Defence and Justification of Mahāmudrā|131}}
 
*** {{i|Defending Mahāmudrā Views|135}}
 
*** {{i|Defending Mahāmudrā Views|135}}
**** {{i|The Self-sufficient White Remedy (dkar po gcig thub)|135}}
+
**** {{i|The Self-sufficient White Remedy (''dkar po gcig thub'')|135}}
**** {{i|Mental Nonengagement (amanasikāra) and the Fire of Wisdom|139}}
+
**** {{i|Mental Nonengagement (''amanasikāra'') and the Fire of Wisdom|139}}
 
** {{i|Concluding Remarks|145}}
 
** {{i|Concluding Remarks|145}}
* {{i|Karma phrin las|148}}
+
 
 +
* {{i|'''Karma phrin las'''|148}}
 
** {{i|Overview|149}}
 
** {{i|Overview|149}}
 
** {{i|Life, Writings and Influences|156}}
 
** {{i|Life, Writings and Influences|156}}
Line 64: Line 66:
 
*** {{i|Buddha Nature Endowed with Qualities|184}}
 
*** {{i|Buddha Nature Endowed with Qualities|184}}
 
*** {{i|On the Unity of the Two Truths|200}}
 
*** {{i|On the Unity of the Two Truths|200}}
*** {{i|“Thoughts are Dharmakāya”|210}}
+
*** {{i|"Thoughts are ''Dharmakāya''"|210}}
*** {{i|Understanding Coemergence: the Inseparability of Samsāra and<br>Nirvana|217}}
+
*** {{i|Understanding Coemergence: the Inseparability of ''Saṃsāra'' and<br>''Nirvāṇa''|217}}
 
** {{i|Concluding Remarks|223}}
 
** {{i|Concluding Remarks|223}}
* {{i|Karma pa Mi bskyod rdo rje|226}}
+
 
 +
* {{i|''Karma pa Mi bskyod rdo rje''|226}}
 
** {{i|Overview|227}}
 
** {{i|Overview|227}}
 
** {{i|The Differentiation and Identification Models|229}}
 
** {{i|The Differentiation and Identification Models|229}}
Line 78: Line 81:
 
*** {{i|Nature of Reality|275}}
 
*** {{i|Nature of Reality|275}}
 
*** {{i|Nature of Mind|277}}
 
*** {{i|Nature of Mind|277}}
*** {{i|The Problem of the Remainder (lhag ma : avasista)|299}}
+
*** {{i|The Problem of the Remainder (''lhag ma'' : ''avaśiṣṭa'')|299}}
 
*** {{i|On the Prospect of a Groundless Ground|314}}
 
*** {{i|On the Prospect of a Groundless Ground|314}}
 
*** {{i|On Whether or Not a Buddha has Wisdom|320}}
 
*** {{i|On Whether or Not a Buddha has Wisdom|320}}
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā as Mental Nonengagement (amanasikāra)|325}}
+
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā as Mental Nonengagement (''amanasikāra'')|325}}
 
** {{i|Concluding Remarks|341}}
 
** {{i|Concluding Remarks|341}}
* {{i|Padma dkar po|342}}
+
 
 +
* {{i|'''Padma dkar po'''|342}}
 
** {{i|Overview|343}}
 
** {{i|Overview|343}}
 
** {{i|Life, Writings and Influences|347}}
 
** {{i|Life, Writings and Influences|347}}
** {{i|The Basic Framework: Mahāmudrā and the Unity of the Two Truths|350}}
+
** {{i|The Basic Framework: ''Mahāmudrā'' and the Unity of the Two Truths|350}}
 
** {{i|Emptiness and the Hermeneutics of the Three Turnings|352}}
 
** {{i|Emptiness and the Hermeneutics of the Three Turnings|352}}
 
** {{i|Hermeneutics of Mahāmudrā as Ground and Path|356}}
 
** {{i|Hermeneutics of Mahāmudrā as Ground and Path|356}}
 
** {{i|The Two Faces of Mahāmudrā: the Modes of Abiding and Error|357}}
 
** {{i|The Two Faces of Mahāmudrā: the Modes of Abiding and Error|357}}
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā as the Mode of Abiding (gnas lugs phyag chen)|359}}
+
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā as the Mode of Abiding (''gnas lugs phyag chen'')|359}}
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā in the Mode of Error ( ’khrul lugs phyag chen)|363}}
+
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā in the Mode of Error ('' 'khrul lugs phyag chen'')|363}}
 
*** {{i|Yang dgon pa on the Two Modes of Mahāmudrā|369}}
 
*** {{i|Yang dgon pa on the Two Modes of Mahāmudrā|369}}
*** {{i|Padma dkar po’s Transposition of Yang dgon pa’s Distinction|376}}
+
*** {{i|Padma dkar po's Transposition of Yang dgon pa's Distinction|376}}
 
*** {{i|Interpretations of the Mahāmudrā Distinction|378}}
 
*** {{i|Interpretations of the Mahāmudrā Distinction|378}}
 
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā and the Unity of the Two Truths|382}}
 
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā and the Unity of the Two Truths|382}}
Line 100: Line 104:
 
** {{i|Path Mahāmudrā and Liberating Knowledge|398}}
 
** {{i|Path Mahāmudrā and Liberating Knowledge|398}}
 
*** {{i|Nonconceptual Knowing in the Shadow of the Bsam yas Debate|399}}
 
*** {{i|Nonconceptual Knowing in the Shadow of the Bsam yas Debate|399}}
*** {{i|Three Strands of Amanasikāra Interpretation in Indian Buddhism|403}}
+
*** {{i|Three Strands of ''Amanasikāra'' Interpretation in Indian Buddhism|403}}
*** {{i|Padma dkar po’s Three Grammatical Interpretations of Amanasikāra|413}}
+
*** {{i|Padma dkar po's Three Grammatical Interpretations of ''Amanasikāra''|413}}
*** {{i|Responding to Criticisms of Amanasikāra|422}}
+
*** {{i|Responding to Criticisms of ''Amanasikāra''|422}}
 
** {{i|Concluding Remarks|426}}
 
** {{i|Concluding Remarks|426}}
* {{i|Final Reflections|429}}
+
* {{i|'''Final Reflections'''|429}}
  
 
'''Volume Two'''
 
'''Volume Two'''

Revision as of 18:43, 6 October 2020

Mahāmudrā and the Middle Way
Book
Book

This two-volume publication explores the complex philosophy of Mahāmudrā that developed in Tibetan Dwags po Bka’ brgyud traditions between the 15th and 16th centuries CE. It examines the attempts to articulate and defend Bka’ brgyud views and practices by four leading post-classical thinkers: (1) Shākya mchog ldan (1423‒1507), a celebrated yet controversial Sa skya scholar who developed a strong affiliation with the Karma Bka’ brgyud Mahāmudrā tradition in the last half of his life, (2) Karma phrin las Phyogs las rnam rgyal (1456‒1539), a renowned Karma Bka’ brgyud scholar-yogin and tutor to the Eighth Karma pa, (3) the Eighth Karma pa himself, Mi bskyod rdo rje (1507‒1554), who was among the most erudite and influential scholar-hierarchs of his generation, (4) and Padma dkar po (1527‒1592), Fourth ’Brug chen of the ’Brug pa Bka’ brgyud lineage who is generally acknowledged as its greatest scholar and systematizer. It is an important academic work published in the Vienna series WSTB and is divided into two volumes: the first offers a detailed philosophical analysis of the authors’ principal views and justifications of Mahāmudrā against the background of Indian and Tibetan Buddhist doctrines on mind, emptiness and buddha nature; the second comprises an annotated anthology of their seminal writings on Mahāmudrā accompanied by critical editions and introductions. These two volumes are the result of research that was generously funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) from 2012 to 2015 under the supervision of Prof. Klaus-Dieter Mathes. The project was entitled “‘Emptiness of Other’ (Gzhan stong) in the Tibetan ‘Great Seal’ (Mahāmudrā) Traditions of the 15th and 16th Centuries” (FWF Project number P23826-G15). (Source: WSTB Description)

Citation Higgins, David, and Martina Draszczyk. Mahāmudrā and the Middle Way: Post-Classical Kagyü Discourses on Mind, Emptiness and Buddha-Nature. Vol. II, Translations, Critical Texts, Bibliography and Index. Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 90.2. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien, 2016.