The Ālayavijñāna in the Context of Indian Buddhist Thought: The Yogācāra Conception of an Unconscious
< Books
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|FullTextRead=No | |FullTextRead=No | ||
− | |BookToc=Acknowledgements ii | + | |BookToc=*{{i|Acknowledgements|ii}} |
− | + | *{{i|Preface|iii}} | |
− | + | *{{i|Introduction|1}}<br><br> | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | *{{i|CHAPTER ONE: CANONICAL BUDDHIST THOUGHT|26}} | |
− | The | + | **{{i|The Three Marks of Existence|28}} |
− | + | **{{i|The Formula of Dependent Co-origination|32}} | |
− | The | + | **{{i|A Short Commentary on ''paṭicca-samuppāda''|35}} |
− | of | + | **{{i|''Karma''|44}} |
− | + | **{{i|Reciprocity of Name-and-Form and Consciousness|47}} | |
− | + | **{{i|Consciousness Conditions Name-and-Form|49}} | |
− | + | **{{i|Craving and the Support of Consciousness|50}} | |
− | + | **{{i|Name-and-form Conditions Consciousness|52}} | |
− | - | + | **{{i|''Sankhārā''|59}} |
− | + | **{{i|''Viññāṇa''|65}} | |
− | + | **{{i|''Viññāṇa'' and Perception|66}} | |
− | + | **{{i|''Viññāṇa'' and Rebirth|68}} | |
− | + | **{{i|''Citta'' and ''Mano''|75}} | |
− | + | **{{i|A Note on ''Saññā''|80}} | |
− | + | **{{i|''Saññā'' and ''Papañca''|83}} | |
− | + | **{{i|''Anusaya''|86}} | |
− | + | **{{i|The Unconscious in Early Buddhism|99}} | |
− | + | **{{i|''āsava''|103}} | |
− | + | **{{i|''Asampajāno mano-sankhārā''|105}} | |
− | + | **{{i|Mind-reading|107}} | |
− | + | **{{i|Remarks on the "Concept of the Unconscious"|113}} | |
− | + | **{{i|Notes to Chapter One|120}}<br><br> | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | The | ||
− | in | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Notes | ||
− | CHAPTER | + | *{{i|CHAPTER TWO: THE ABHIDHARMA CONTEXT|133}} |
− | FREUD'S AND JUNG'S THEORIES OF THE UNCONSCIOUS 400 | + | **{{i|Background of the Abhidharma|135}} |
− | Common | + | **{{i|The Abhidharma System of Mind|142}} |
− | and | + | **{{i|''Citta-caitta''|152}} |
− | Common | + | **{{i|The ''caittas''|154}} |
− | + | **{{i|''Citta-viprayuktā-saṃskārā''|157}} | |
− | + | **{{i|The Six ''hetus'', Five ''phalas'', and Four ''pratyayas''|161}} | |
− | + | **{{i|''Karma'' and ''Kleśa'' in the ''Kośa''|172}} | |
− | + | **{{i|The Problematics of Abhidharma Analysis|183}} | |
− | + | **{{i|The Sarvāstivādin Concepts|189}} | |
− | + | **{{i|The ''kleśa''/''anuśaya'' Controversy|196}} | |
− | + | **{{i|The Sautrāntika Concept of Seeds (''bīja'' )|204}} | |
− | + | **{{i|The Problematics Generated by the Concept of Seeds|210}} | |
− | + | **{{i|Notes to Chapter Two|229}}<br><br> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | *{{i|CHAPTER THREE: THE ''ĀLAYAVIJÑĀNA'' IN THE YOGĀCĀRA|248}} | |
− | + | **{{i|Introduction to the Yogācāra Chapter|249}} | |
− | The | + | **{{i|The Yogācāra conception of the ''ālayavijñāna''<br> - Review of Chapters 1 and 2|253}} |
− | Did a Common | + | **{{i|The ''Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra'', the ''Yogācārabhūmi'' and the Origins of the<br> ''ālayavijñāna''|268}} |
− | + | **{{i|The ''Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra'''s New Model of the Mind|273}} | |
− | Notes | + | **{{i|The ''ālaya'' Treatise of the ''Yogācārabhūmi''|281}} |
− | CONCLUSION 495 | + | **{{i|The Proof Portion of the ''ālaya'' Treatise|281}} |
− | APPENDIX 503 | + | **{{i|The Introduction of the Afflicted Mind (''kliṣṭa-manas'')|291}} |
− | + | **{{i|The ''ālayavijñāna'' in the ''Pravṛtti''/''Nivṛtti'' Portions|297}} | |
− | + | **{{i|The ''Pravṛtti'' Portion|300}} | |
− | Notes 516 | + | **{{i|The ''Nivṛtti'' Portion|307}} |
− | + | **{{i|The ''ālayavijñāna'' in the ''Mahāyāna-saṃgraha''|312}} | |
− | + | **{{i|Idealism and Yogācāra|312}} | |
− | + | **{{i|The ''Mahāyāna-saṃgraha''|319}} | |
− | Notes 537 | + | **{{i|The Synonyms of the ''ālayavijñāna'' in the ''Mahāyāna-saṃgraha''|319}} |
− | + | **{{i|The Afflicted Mind in the ''Mahāyāna-saṃgraha''|324}} | |
− | of | + | **{{i|The Characteristics of the ''ālayavijñāna'' in the ''Mahāyāna-saṃgraha''|332}} |
− | Notes 563 | + | **{{i|Infusing and Seeding the ''ālayavijñāna''|335}} |
− | + | **{{i|The Demonstration of the ''ālayavijñāna'' in the ''Mahāyāna-saṃgraha''|342}} | |
− | + | **{{i|Logical Arguments for the ''ālayavijñāna''|343}} | |
− | Notes 635 | + | **{{i|Canonical Interludes|348}} |
− | + | **{{i|Rebirth and the ''ālayavijñāna'' in Yogācāra|354}} | |
− | BIBLIOGRAPHY 721 | + | **{{i|Supramundane Purification|358}} |
+ | **{{i|The ''ālayavijñāna'', Language and Society|368}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Notes to Chapter Three|377}}<br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | *{{i|CHAPTER FOUR: A COMPARISON OF THE ''ĀLAYAVIJÑĀNA'' WITH<br>FREUD'S AND JUNG'S THEORIES OF THE UNCONSCIOUS|400}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Common Problematics Between the ''ālayavijñāna'' and the Unconscious|404}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Common Characteristics|408}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Latency|408}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Latent Causal Efficacy|415}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Simultaneity and Reciprocal Conditionality|420}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Cognitive Processes|427}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Matrix of All Conscious Acts|430}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Conclusion to Common Characteristics|433}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Divergences|437}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Rebirth|438}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Repression|439}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Energetics and Hermeneutics|444}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Instinctual Drives|459}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Conclusion|463}} | ||
+ | **{{i|The Collective Unconscious and the ''ālayavijñāna''|468}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Did a Common Problematic Lead to the ''ālayavijñāna'' and the<br>Unconscious?|474}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Notes to Chapter Four|482}}<br><br> | ||
+ | *{{i|CONCLUSION|495}} | ||
+ | *{{i|APPENDIX|503}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Translation of the ''Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra''<br>Chapter V and VIII.37|504}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|Notes|516}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|Tibetan Text|520}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Translation of the Proof Portion of the ''Yogācārabhūmi-Viniścaya-<br>saṃgrahaṇī''|526}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|Notes|537}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Translation of the ''Pravṛtti''/''Nivṛtti'' Portions of the ''Yogācārabhūmi-Viniścaya-saṃgrahaṇī''|539}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|Notes|563}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|Tibetan Text|571}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Translation of Ch. 1 of the ''Mahāyāna-saṃgraha''|583}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|Notes|635}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Outline of the Texts|716}} | ||
+ | *{{i|BIBLIOGRAPHY|721}} | ||
|AddRelatedTab=No | |AddRelatedTab=No | ||
+ | |StopPersonRedirects=No | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 10:44, 10 August 2020
Abstract
The thesis focuses on the relations between mind and karma and the continuity of life in saṃsāra based upon a concept of mind, the ālayavijñāna, as presented in the texts of Asaṅga and Vasubandhu of the Yogācāra school of Indian Buddhism, A.D. 4-5th centuries. It has been the topic of many sectarian disputes as well as the springboard for several far-reaching doctrinal developments, so it is desirable to examine it within its early Indian Buddhist context.
The first section presents the multivalent viññāṇa of the Pali Canon and related concepts. It demonstrates that the major characteristics later predicated of the ālayavijñāna were present in an unsystematized but implicit form in the viññāṇa of the early discourses.
The next section describes the systematic psychological analysis developed by the Abhidharma and its consequent problematics. It argues that the incongruity of Abhidharmic analysis with the older unsystematized doctrines led to major theoretical problems concerning the key concepts of kleśa and karma, to which the Sautrāntika school offered the concept of seeds (bija).
The third section, based primarily upon the texts translated herein, depicts the origination and gradual development of the ālayavijñāna within the Yogācāra school from a somatic "life principle", to an explicitly unconscious mind, to its final bifurcation into an unconscious afflicted mind (kliṣṭa-manas) and a passive respository of karmic seeds, the latent loci of kleśa and karma, respectively.
The last section compares the ālayavijñāna systematically with Freud's and Jung's concepts of the unconscious, concluding that their respective philosophical milieus led both traditions to conceptions of unconscious mental processes as necessary compensations for strictly intentional epistemological models.
In the appendix the major texts presenting the ālayavijñāna, Chaps. V and VIII.37 of the Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra, part of the Viniścaya-saṃgrahaṇī of the Yogācārabhūmi, and Ch. 1 of the Mahāyāna-saṃgraha, are translated and extensively annotated in order to contextualize the minutiae of this concept of mind with its canonical precursors and its Abhidharmic contemporaries. (Source: ProQuest)
Citation | Waldron, William S. "The Ālayavijñāna in the Context of Indian Buddhist Thought: The Yogācāra Conception of an Unconscious." PhD diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1990. |
---|---|