The Buddha Nature: A Study of the Tathāgatagarbha and Ālayavijñāna (Dissertation)

From Buddha-Nature

< Books

LibraryDissertationsThe Buddha Nature: A Study of the Tathāgatagarbha and Ālayavijñāna (Dissertation)

(Created page with "{{Book |FullTextRead=No |AddRelatedTab=No }}")
 
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Book
 
{{Book
 
|FullTextRead=No
 
|FullTextRead=No
 +
|BookToc=*Chapter
 +
*{{i|I. Introduction|1}}
 +
**{{i|Part One|4}}
 +
**{{i|Part Two|23}}
 +
**{{i|Part Three|34}}
 +
 +
<center>Part One</center>
 +
<center>The ''Tathāgatagarbha'' in the ''Śrī-Mālā Sūtra''</center>
 +
<center>and the ''Ratnagotrabibhāga''</center>
 +
*{{i|II. Analysis of the ''Śrī-Mālā Sūtra''|39}}
 +
**{{i|''Tathāgatagarbha'' as Ontic Subjectivity|41}}
 +
**{{i|''Tathāgatagarbha'' and Soteriology|45}}
 +
**{{i|The Status of the Buddha|54}}
 +
**{{i|''Tathāgatagarbha'' and Epistemology|58}}
 +
**{{i|The Nescience Entrenchment|61}}
 +
**{{i|The Buddha Natures|64}}
 +
**{{i|The Four Noble Truths|67}}
 +
**{{i|''Tathāgatagarbha'' as Both ''Śūnya'' and ''Aśūnya''|75}}
 +
**{{i|''Tathāgatagarbha'' as Self-Explicitating Knowledge|81}}
 +
**{{i|Evaluation|86}}
 +
*{{i|III. The ''Ratnagotravibhāga''|91}}
 +
**{{i|The Jewels of the ''Dharma'' and the ''Saṃgha''|97}}
 +
**{{i|''Samalā'' and ''Nirmalā'' ''Tathatā''|105}}
 +
**{{i|Threefold Meaning of the ''Tathāgatagarbha''|108}}
 +
**{{i|The Meaning of ''Gotra''|112}}
 +
*{{i|IV. Characteristics of the Embryo Reality: Its Self-Nature|125}}
 +
**{{i|The Cause of the Embryo's Purification|126}}
 +
**{{i|The Four Supreme Virtues: Antidotal Methodology|129}}
 +
**{{i|''Ātma-Pāramitā'': Supreme Unity|142}}
 +
**{{i|''Nitya-Pāramitā'': Supreme Eternity|154}}
 +
**{{i|Supreme Bliss and Supreme Purity|161}}
 +
**{{i|The Result of the Embryo's Self-Purification|164}}
 +
**{{i|The Union with the Purifying Factors|166}}
 +
*{{i|V. Further Characteristics of the Embryo|169}}
 +
**{{i|The Function of the Embryo Towards Self-Purification|169}}
 +
**{{i|The Embryo's Manifestation|173}}
 +
**{{i|''Cittaprakṛti'': the Innate Mind|178}}
 +
**{{i|Buddhahood and ''Nirvāṇa''|192}}
 +
*{{i|VI. Nine Illustrations of the ''Garbha''|201}}
 +
**{{i|Threefold Nature of the ''Tathāgatagarbha''|207}}
 +
*{{i|VII. The ''Tathāgatagarbha'' and ''Śūnyatā''|215}}
 +
**{{i|The ''Tathāgatagarbha'' as ''Śūnya'' and ''Aśūnya''|224}}
 +
**{{i|The ''Ratnagotra'' and the ''Prajñāpāramitā'' Tradition|235}}
 +
*{{i|VIII. The Properties of the Buddha|249}}
 +
**{{i|''Nirmalā Tathatā''|252}}
 +
**{{i|Evaluation|262}}
 +
 +
<center>Part Two</center>
 +
<center>The ''Alayavijñāna'' in the ''Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra''</center>
 +
<center>And the ''Ch'eng Wei-Shih Lun''</center>
 +
*{{i|IX. The ''Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra''|271}}
 +
**{{i|The Union of the ''Tathāgatagarbha'' and the ''Ālayavijñāna''|271}}
 +
**{{i|The Confusion of Epistemology and Ontology in the ''Laṅkāvatāra''|279}}
 +
*{{i|X. The ''Ch'eng Wei-Shih Lun''|292}}
 +
**{{i|The Metaphysics of Mere-Consciousness|292}}
 +
**{{i|The ''Ālayavijñāna'' and the ''Bījas''|301}}
 +
*{{i|XI. The ''Ālayavijñāna'' and Ignorance|314}}
 +
**{{i|''Ātmagrāha'' and ''Dharmagrāha''|314}}
 +
**{{i|The ''Manas'' and ''Manovijñāna''|316}}
 +
**{{i|The Ultimate Origin of Ignorance|326}}
 +
*{{i|XII. The Holy Path of Attainment|332}}
 +
**{{i|The Stage of Moral Provisioning|332}}
 +
**{{i|The Stage of Intensified Effort|333}}
 +
**{{i|The Stage of Unimpeded Penetrating Understanding|336}}
 +
**{{i|The Stage of Exercising Cultivation|339}}
 +
**{{i|The Stage of Ultimate Realization|350}}
 +
 +
<center>Part Three</center>
 +
<center>The ''Tathāgatagarbha-Ālayavijñāna''</center>
 +
<center>Summary and Comparison</center>
 +
 +
*{{i|XIII. Conclusion|356}}
 +
**{{i|The ''Tathāgatagarbha'' in the ''Śrī-Māla Sūtra''|356}}
 +
**{{i|The ''Tathāgatagarbha'' in the ''Ratnagotravibhāga''|361}}
 +
**{{i|The ''Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra''|374}}
 +
**{{i|The ''Ch'eng Wei-Shih Lun''|378}}
 +
**{{i|The Ultimate Status of Ignorance in the Theory of the ''Tathāgatagarbha-Ālayavijñāna''|382}}
 +
**{{i|The ''Tathāgatagarbha-Ālayavijñāna'' and the Hegelian Absolute Spirit|391}}
 +
 +
*{{i|Appendix 1|418}}
 +
*{{i|Appendix 2|422}}
 +
*{{i|Selected Bibliography|425}}
 +
|StopPersonRedirects=No
 
|AddRelatedTab=No
 
|AddRelatedTab=No
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 19:15, 18 July 2023

The Buddha Nature: A Study of the Tathāgatagarbha and Ālayavijñāna (Dissertation)
Dissertation
Dissertation

Abstract

The present dissertation identifies the ontological presuppositions and the corresponding soteriological-epistemological principles that sustain and define the Mahāyāna Buddhist belief in the inherent potentiality of all animate beings to attain the supreme and perfect enlightenment of Buddhahood. More specifically, the study establishes a coherent metaphysic of Absolute Suchness (Tathatā), synthesizing the variant traditions of the Tathāgata-embryo (Tathāgatagarbha) and the Storehouse Consciousness (Ālayavijñāna).
      The dissertation interprets the Buddhist enlightenment as the salvific-transformational moment in which Tathatā "awakens" to itself, comes to perfect self-realization as the Absolute Suchness of reality, in and through phenomenal human consciousness. It is an interpretation of the Buddhist Path as the spontaneous self-emergence of "embryonic" absolute knowledge as it comes to free itself from the concealments of adventitious defilements, and possess itself in fully self-explicitated self-consciousness as the "Highest Truth" and unconditional nature of all existence; it does so only in the form of omniscient wisdom.
      Aside from Ruegg's La Theorie du Tathāgatagarbha et du Gotra and Verdu's study of the Ālayavijñāna in Dialectical Aspects in Buddhist Thought, Western scholarship treating of the subject is negligible. And while both sources are excellent technical treatises, they fail to integrate in any detailed analysis the dual concepts as complementary modes of each other. Thus, the dissertation, while adopting the methodology of textual analysis, has as its emphasis a thematic-interpretive study of its sources. Conducting a detailed analysis into the structure of the texts, the dissertation delineates and appropriates the inherent ontological, soteriological and epistemological foci which they themselves assume as their natural form.
      Structurally, the dissertation is divided into three major parts. The first focuses on the Tathāgatagarbha, the second on the Ālayavijñāna, the third on their relation and deeper significance in the human thought tradition. The first two parts are sub-divided into seven and four chapters respectively. The former seven chapters establish the ontological identity of the Tathāgata-embryo (Tathagātagarbha) through a critical examination of the major sūtral authority for the concept, i.e., the Śrī-Mālā-Sūtra, and the primary śāstral elaboration inspired by it, viz., the Ratnagotravlbhāga.
      Following the same pattern, the four chapters of part 2 note the role of the Laṅk¯āvatāra Sūtra as a principal scriptural advocate for the theory of the Storehouse Consciousness (Ālayavijñāna), while detailing the scholastic amplification of it in Hsüan Tsang's Ch'eng Wei-Shih Lun. Part 3 concludes the study by recapitulating the principal developments in the emergent complementarity of the two concepts, arguing that any adequate discussion of the Buddha Nature must be informed on the one hand by the theory of the Tathāgatagarbha which grounds and authenticates its ontological status, and on the other by the Ālayavijñāna, its noetic-cognitive determination. While the former tends to elucidate the process towards, and experience of enlightenment as a function of Absolute Suchness (Tathatā), the latter adopts the reciprocal perspective and examines the subject in the light and function of phenomenal consciousness.
      By way of comparison with Western thought, the chapter likewise demonstrates the analogous dynamic in the bilateral theory of the Tathāgatagarbha-Ālayavijñāna and the Hegelian Absolute Spirit in-and-for-itself. Focusing upon The Phenomenology of Spirit, the chapter notes that the self-becoming process in and through which consciousness realizes its own plenitude is strikingly homologous to the theory of Buddhist enlightenment presented through the concept of the Tathāgatagarbha-Ālayavijñāna. It suggests that these two representative thought systems mutually illumine each other, and together illustrate a correspondent framework within which the relationship of the Absolute and relative may gain a more universal conception and therefore, a more comprehensive resolution.

Citation Brown, Brian Edward. "The Buddha Nature: A Study of the Tathāgatagarbha and Ālayavijñāna." PhD diss., Fordham University, 1981.