|
|
| (15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| |PersonPage=Lee, S. | | |PersonPage=Lee, S. |
| |PersonName=Sumi Lee | | |PersonName=Sumi Lee |
| | }}{{Book-person |
| | |PersonPage=Taehyŏn |
| | |PersonName=Taehyŏn |
| }} | | }} |
| |FullTextRead=No | | |FullTextRead=No |
| Line 8: |
Line 11: |
| *{{i|''Lists of Charts''|xi}} | | *{{i|''Lists of Charts''|xi}} |
| *{{i|''Abbreviations''|xii}} | | *{{i|''Abbreviations''|xii}} |
| *{{i|Acknowledgements|xiii}} | | *{{i|''Acknowledgements''|xiii}} |
|
| |
|
| *{{i|'''INTRODUCTION'''|1}} | | *{{i|'''INTRODUCTION'''|1}} |
| **{{i|1. The Origin of the Problem: Taehyŏn and the Difficulty of Determining His Yogācāra Doctrinal Position|1}} | | **{{i|1. The Origin of the Problem: Taehyŏn and the Difficulty of Determining His Yogācāra Doctrinal Position|1}} |
| **{{i|2. Traditional Bifurcations of East Asian Yogācāra Buddhism and Their Problems|9}} | | **{{i|2. Traditional Bifurcations of East Asian Yogācāra Buddhism and Their<br>Problems|9}} |
| ***{{i|(1) "Old" Yogācāra Buddhism vs. "New" Yogācāra Buddhism; Paramārtha vs. Xuanzang|9}} | | ***{{i|(1) "Old" Yogācāra Buddhism vs. "New" Yogācāra Buddhism; Paramārtha vs. Xuanzang|9}} |
| ***{{i|(2) Tathāgatagarbha Theory vs. Yogācāra Theory; One Vehicle vs. Three Vehicles|14}} | | ***{{i|(2) Tathāgatagarbha Theory vs. Yogācāra Theory; One Vehicle vs. Three Vehicles|14}} |
| Line 24: |
Line 27: |
| **{{i|4. Concluding Remarks|41}} | | **{{i|4. Concluding Remarks|41}} |
|
| |
|
| *{{i|'''CHAPTER II. "Old" Yogācāra: Two Strands of the Shelun School|42}} | | *{{i|'''CHAPTER II. "Old" Yogācāra: Two Strands of the Shelun Schoo'''l|42}} |
| **{{i|1. Issues|42}} | | **{{i|1. Issues|42}} |
| **{{i|2. Distinction between Paramārtha's and Tanqian's Shelun Lineages |47}} | | **{{i|2. Distinction between Paramārtha's and Tanqian's Shelun Lineages |47}} |
| Line 30: |
Line 33: |
| ***{{i|(2) Reconsideration of Paramārtha’s Doctrine of Amalavijñāna|52}} | | ***{{i|(2) Reconsideration of Paramārtha’s Doctrine of Amalavijñāna|52}} |
| ***{{i|(3) Two Types of Interpretations of the Nature of Realization: Perfect Enlightenment and Potential Enlightenment|63}} | | ***{{i|(3) Two Types of Interpretations of the Nature of Realization: Perfect Enlightenment and Potential Enlightenment|63}} |
| ***{{i|(4) Connection between the Unconditioned and Conditioned I: The Duality of Thusness|71}} | | ***{{i|(4) Connection between the Unconditioned and Conditioned I: The<br>Duality of Thusness|71}} |
| ***{{i|(5) Connection between the Unconditioned and Conditioned II: Two Types of Attainment of the Dharma Body|77}} | | ***{{i|(5) Connection between the Unconditioned and Conditioned II: Two<br>Types of Attainment of the Dharma Body|77}} |
| ***{{i|(6) Connection between the Unconditioned and Conditioned III: The Connection between the Nature of Realization and the Buddha<br>Bodies|80}} | | ***{{i|(6) Connection between the Unconditioned and Conditioned III: The Connection between the Nature of Realization and the Buddha<br>Bodies|80}} |
| ***{{i|(7) Disappearance of the Distinction between the Two Shelun Strands|86}} | | ***{{i|(7) Disappearance of the Distinction between the Two Shelun Strands|86}} |
| Line 37: |
Line 40: |
| **{{i|4. Concluding Remarks|102}} | | **{{i|4. Concluding Remarks|102}} |
|
| |
|
| *{{i|'''CHAPTER III. Emergence of Antagonism between the "Old" and "New" Yogācāra'''|104}} | | *{{i|'''CHAPTER III. Emergence of Antagonism between the "Old" and "New"<br>Yogācāra'''|104}} |
| **{{i|1. Transmission of the "New" Buddhist Literature and Doctrinal<br>Diversity|104}} | | **{{i|1. Transmission of the "New" Buddhist Literature and Doctrinal<br>Diversity|104}} |
| **{{i|2. Problems in Interpreting the New Yogācāra as the Dharma Characteristics School|107}} | | **{{i|2. Problems in Interpreting the New Yogācāra as the Dharma Characteristics School|107}} |
| **{{i|3. Ji’s Yogācāra Position I: Antagonism towards the One Vehicle and Bhāvaviveka|121}} | | **{{i|3. Ji’s Yogācāra Position I: Antagonism towards the One Vehicle and<br>Bhāvaviveka|121}} |
| ***{{i|(1) Background: Outbreak of the Buddha Nature Controversy and the Emptiness-Existence Controversy|123}} | | ***{{i|(1) Background: Outbreak of the Buddha Nature Controversy and the Emptiness-Existence Controversy|123}} |
| ***{{i|(2) New Yogācāra Doctrinal Positions Derived from the Eight-Consciousness System in Comparison with the Tathāgatagarbha<br>Position|128}} | | ***{{i|(2) New Yogācāra Doctrinal Positions Derived from the Eight-<br>Consciousness System in Comparison with the Tathāgatagarbha<br>Position|128}} |
| ***{{i|(3) The Doctrine of Uncontaminated Seeds and Criticism of Bhāvaviveka: Ji’s Response to the Two Controversies|133}} | | ***{{i|(3) The Doctrine of Uncontaminated Seeds and Criticism of Bhāvaviveka: <br>Ji’s Response to the Two Controversies|133}} |
| **{{i|4. Ji’s Yogācāra Position II: Embracing One Vehicle Thought and Bhāvaviveka’s Madhyamaka|139}} | | **{{i|4. Ji’s Yogācāra Position II: Embracing One Vehicle Thought and Bhāvaviveka’s Madhyamaka|139}} |
| ***{{i|(1) Background: Translation of the Mahāprajñāpāramitāsūtra and its Influence on the Two Controversies|140}} | | ***{{i|(1) Background: Translation of the Mahāprajñāpāramitāsūtra and its <br>Influence on the Two Controversies|140}} |
| ***{{i|(2) Embracing One Vehicle Thought and Bhāvaviveka’s Madhyamaka|144}} | | ***{{i|(2) Embracing One Vehicle Thought and Bhāvaviveka’s Madhyamaka|144}} |
| ***{{i|(3) Two Types of Buddha Nature: Ji’s Theoretical Basis for Embracing the Universal Buddha Nature|150}} | | ***{{i|(3) Two Types of Buddha Nature: Ji’s Theoretical Basis for Embracing the Universal Buddha Nature|150}} |
| Line 51: |
Line 54: |
| **{{i|5. Concluding Remarks|160}} | | **{{i|5. Concluding Remarks|160}} |
|
| |
|
| CHAPTER IV. Synthesis of the "Old" and "New" Yogācāra Systems: Wŏnhyo and Fazang's Interpretations of the Awakening of Faith .............................................................. 161 | | *{{i|'''CHAPTER IV. Synthesis of the "Old" and "New" Yogācāra Systems: Wŏnhyo and Fazang's Interpretations of the Awakening of Faith'''|161}} |
| 1. Social Background and the Emergence of the Awakening of Faith .................................... 161 | | **{{i|1. Social Background and the Emergence of the Awakening of Faith|161}} |
| | **{{i|2. Wŏnhyo and Fazang’s Compromises between Madhyamaka and Yogācāra<br>and the Differences in their Perspectives|166}} |
| | ***{{i|(1) Wŏnhyo's Binary Perspective|166}} |
| | ***{{i|(2) Fazang's Hierarchical Synthesis|178}} |
| | ***{{i|(3) Concluding Remarks|188}} |
| | **{{i|3. Significance of Wŏnhyo and Fazang's distinct interpretations of the AMF<br>in the East Asian Yogācāra Tradition|189}} |
| | ***{{i|(1) Wŏnhyo as a Successor of Paramārtha|189}} |
| | ***{{i|(2) Fazang: Origin of the Teaching of Dependent Origination from the Tathāgatagarbha|196}} |
| | ***{{i|4. Concluding Remarks|201}} |
|
| |
|
| 2. Wŏnhyo and Fazang’s Compromises between Madhyamaka and Yogācāra and the Differences in their Perspectives ............................................................................................. 166
| | *{{i|'''CHAPTER V. Synthesis of the One Vehicle and the Three Vehicles: Taehyŏn's Interpretation of the AMF, the ''Sūtra of Brahmā's Net'', and the ''Cheng weishi lun'' '''|203}} |
| (1) Wŏnhyo's Binary Perspective ......................................................................................... 166
| | **{{i|1. Taehyŏn's Yogācāra Thought from a New Perspective|203}} |
| (2) Fazang's Hierarchical Synthesis ..................................................................................... 178
| | **{{i|2. Taehyŏn's Yogācāra Thought in the ''Taesŭng kisillon naeŭi yakt’amgi''|205}} |
| (3) Concluding Remarks ...................................................................................................... 188
| | ***{{i|(1) Balanced Perspective toward the One Vehicle and the Three<br>Vehicles|205}} |
| 3. Significance of Wŏnhyo and Fazang's distinct interpretations of the AMF in the East Asian Yogācāra Tradition .................................................................................................................. 189
| | ***{{i|(2) Binary Perspective on the Buddha Nature I: Distinction between the Original Awakening and the Nature of Realization|210}} |
| (1) Wŏnhyo as a Successor of Paramārtha ........................................................................... 189
| | **{{i|3. Taehyŏn's View on Buddhist Precepts Represented in the Pŏmmanggyŏng kojŏkki|214}} |
| (2) Fazang: Origin of the Teaching of Dependent Origination from the Tathāgatagarbha 196
| | ***{{i|(1) Balanced View toward the Śrāvaka Precepts and the Bodhisattva<br>Precepts|214}} |
| 4. Concluding Remarks ........................................................................................................... 201
| | ***{{i|(2) Binary Perspective on the Buddha Nature II: Universal Buddha Nature<br>as the Cause|221}} |
| CHAPTER V. Synthesis of the One Vehicle and the Three Vehicles: Taehyŏn's Interpretation of the AMF, the Sūtra of Brahmā's Net, and the Cheng weishi lun ............. 203 | | **{{i|4. Taehyŏn’s Response to the Emptiness-Existence Controversy Represented<br>in the ''Sŏng yusik non hakki''|224}} |
| 1. Taehyŏn's Yogācāra Thought from a New Perspective ...................................................... 203 | | ***{{i|(1) Taehyŏn's Position on the Emptiness-Existence Controversy and Its Significance|224}} |
| 2. Taehyŏn's Yogācāra Thought in the Taesŭng kisillon naeŭi yakt’amgi .............................. 205 | | ***{{i|(2) Binary Perspective on the Innate Uncontaminated Seeds: Coexistence<br>of the Doctrines of Five Distinct Lineages and the Universal Gotra|229}} |
| (1) Balanced Perspective toward the One Vehicle and the Three Vehicles ......................... 205 | | **{{i|5. Concluding Remarks|235}} |
| (2) Binary Perspective on the Buddha Nature I: Distinction between the Original Awakening and the Nature of Realization ............................................................................................... 210 | |
| 3. Taehyŏn's View on Buddhist Precepts Represented in the Pŏmmanggyŏng kojŏkki .......... 214 | |
| (1) Balanced View toward the Śrāvaka Precepts and the Bodhisattva Precepts .................. 214 | |
| (2) Binary Perspective on the Buddha Nature II: Universal Buddha Nature as the Cause .. 221 | |
|
| |
|
| 4. Taehyŏn’s Response to the Emptiness-Existence Controversy Represented in the Sŏng yusik non hakki.................................................................................................................................. 224
| | *{{i|'''CONCLUSION'''|237}} |
| (1) Taehyŏn's Position on the Emptiness-Existence Controversy and Its Significance ....... 224
| | |
| (2) Binary Perspective on the Innate Uncontaminated Seeds: Coexistence of the Doctrines of Five Distinct Lineages and the Universal Gotra .................................................................. 229
| | *{{i|''Bibliography''|242}} |
| 5. Concluding Remarks ........................................................................................................... 235
| |
| CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 237 | |
| Bibliography ............................................................................................................................... 242 | |
| |AddRelatedTab=No | | |AddRelatedTab=No |
| | |StopPersonRedirects=No |
| }} | | }} |