A Direct Path to the Buddha Within

From Buddha-Nature

< Books

LibraryBooksA Direct Path to the Buddha Within

 
(29 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Book
 
{{Book
|BookParentPage=Research/Secondary Sources
+
|TileDescription=A translation and study of an important Kagyu commentary on the ''Ratnagotravibhāga''.
 
|BookPerson={{Book-person
 
|BookPerson={{Book-person
 +
|PersonPage=Mathes, K.
 
|PersonName=Mathes, Klaus-Dieter
 
|PersonName=Mathes, Klaus-Dieter
|PersonPage=Mathes, K
 
|PersonImage=https://research.tsadra.org/index.php/Mathes,_K.#/media/File:Mathes,_Klaus-Dieter_RYI_Photo_2017.jpg
 
 
}}{{Book-person
 
}}{{Book-person
 +
|PersonPage='gos_lo_tsA_ba_gzhon_nu_dpal
 
|PersonName=Gö Lotsāwa Zhönu Pal
 
|PersonName=Gö Lotsāwa Zhönu Pal
|PersonPage='gos lo tsA ba gzhon nu dpal
 
|PersonImage=https://research.tsadra.org/index.php/%27gos_lo_ts%C4%81_ba_gzhon_nu_dpal#/media/File:Go_Lotsawa_Shonnu_Pal.jpg
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
|FullTextRead=No
 
|FullTextRead=No
|BookEssay=A Direct Path to the Buddha Within is one of a handful of recent densely-presented studies of Tibetan attempts to grapple with the Uttaratantra and tathāgatagarbha theory. Klaus-Dieter Mathes takes as his focus Go Lotsāwa Zhonnu Pel's commentary on the sūtra, the translation of which makes up 165 pages out of the 421 of the book (excluding back matter). Preceding the translation are three introductory chapters on the intellectual context of Go's work. The translation is followed by three chapters that individually address Mathes' three questions: What are "subtle" buddha qualities, How is buddha-nature related to prājñaparamitā, and How does Go Lotsāwa read Mahāmudrā into the Uttaratantra and other Yogacāra works? The book assumes a high level of understanding of the issues and is meticulous in its detail and documentation; the footnotes have footnotes.  
+
|TextTranslated=Texts/Theg pa chen po rgyud bla ma'i bstan bcos kyi 'grel bshad de kho na nyid rab tu gsal ba'i me long
 +
|BookEssay=''A Direct Path to the Buddha Within'' is one of a handful of recent densely-presented studies of Tibetan attempts to grapple with the ''Uttaratantra'' and tathāgatagarbha theory. [[Klaus-Dieter Mathes]] takes as his focus [[Gö Lotsāwa Zhönu Pal]]'s commentary on the sūtra, the translation of which makes up 165 pages out of the 421 of the book (excluding back matter). Preceding the translation are three introductory chapters on the intellectual context of 's work. The translation is followed by three chapters that individually address Mathes' three questions: what are "subtle" buddha qualities, how is buddha-nature related to prājñaparamitā, and how does [[Gö Lotsāwa]] read Mahāmudrā into the ''Uttaratantra'' and other Yogācāra works? The book assumes a high level of understanding of the issues and is meticulous in its detail and documentation; the footnotes have footnotes.  
  
Mathes argues that Go's intention with his commentary was to provide a sūtra basis for Mahāmudrā, the otherwise tantric teaching of the Kagyu tradition. There is some irony in this, as Mathes somewhat blithely dismisses what he claims was Longchenpa's attempt to use the same material to find an Indian basis for Dzogchen, an otherwise tantric teaching of the Nyingma tradition. Both great masters did indeed seem hard-pressed to justify the central teaching of their tradition against criticism of Prājñaparamitā-based Madhyamaka adherents in the Sakya and Kadam/Geluk traditions. These criticisms generally centered on the issue of whether the ultimate could correctly be described as possessing qualities of its own or whether emptiness was in fact a radical denial of all propositions. Sakya, Kadam, and Geluk writers argued either that the Uttaratantra was provisional -- a Yogacāra teaching in need of interpretation -- or its teaching on buddha-nature was in line with a Madhyamaka presentation of emptiness, denying the language-positive elements of the scripture.  
+
Mathes argues that 's intention with his commentary was to provide a sūtra basis for Mahāmudrā, the otherwise tantric teaching of the Kagyu tradition. There is some irony in this, as Mathes somewhat blithely dismisses what he claims was [[Longchenpa]]'s attempt to use the same material to find an Indian basis for Dzokchen, an otherwise tantric teaching of the Nyingma tradition. Both great masters did indeed seem hard-pressed to justify the central teaching of their tradition against criticism of Prājñaparamitā-based Madhyamaka adherents in the Sakya and Kadam/Geluk traditions. These criticisms generally centered on the issue of whether the ultimate could correctly be described as possessing qualities of its own or whether emptiness was, in fact, a radical denial of all propositions. Sakya, Kadam, and Geluk writers argued either that the ''Uttaratantra'' was provisional—a Yogācāra teaching in need of interpretation—or its teaching on buddha-nature was in line with a Madhyamaka presentation of emptiness, denying the language-positive elements of the scripture.  
  
Go rejected both of these positions, arguing that the Uttaratantra is consistent with other Third-Turning teachings of Yogacāra and that such teachings are definitive. This was a necessary move in order to conflate cataphatic Yogacāra doctrine with Mahāmudrā: buddha-nature for Go is not a synonym for emptiness, but rather for "the unfabricated nature of mind" and "luminosity," core Mahāmudrā doctrine. But Go differentiated his approach from other advocates of a Yogacāra interpretation. He argued against the notion that buddha-nature is fully formed in every sentient being (the "buddha qualities" discussion), advocating instead that buddha-nature is a potential that needs to be developed. We are not like golden statues hidden in mud, but rather like acorns that need water and sunlight to grow into oak trees.
+
rejected both of these positions, arguing that the ''Uttaratantra'' is consistent with other Third-Turning teachings of Yogācāra and that such teachings are definitive. This was a necessary move in order to conflate cataphatic Yogācāra doctrine with Mahāmudrā: buddha-nature for is not a synonym for emptiness, but rather for "the unfabricated nature of mind" and "luminosity," core Mahāmudrā doctrine. But differentiated his approach from other advocates of a Yogācāra interpretation. He argued against the notion that buddha-nature is fully formed in every sentient being (the "buddha qualities" discussion), advocating instead that buddha-nature is a potential that needs to be developed. We are not like golden statues hidden in mud, but rather like acorns that need water and sunlight to grow into oak trees.
|BookToc=*[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/Abbreviations | Abbreviations]] viii
+
|BookToc=* {{i|Abbreviations|viii}}
*[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/Preface | Preface]] ix
+
* {{i|Preface|ix}}
*[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/Introduction | Introduction]] 1
+
* {{i|Introduction|1}}
**General Remarks i
+
** {{i|General Remarks|1}}
**Delimitation of the Subject and Methods Employed 3
+
** {{i|Delimitation of the Subject and Methods Employed|3}}
**The ''Ratnagotravibhāga'' and Its ''Vyākhyā'' 7
+
** {{i|The ''Ratnagotravibhāga'' and Its ''Vyākhyā''|7}}
**The Reaction of Mainstream Mahāyāna to the Theory of Buddha Nature 17
+
** {{i|The Reaction of Mainstream Mahāyāna to the Theory of Buddha Nature|17}}
 
+
* {{i|Part I:The Tibetan Historical Context}}
*Part I:The Tibetan Historical Context
+
** {{i|1. The Development of Various Traditions of Interpreting Buddha Nature|25}}
**[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/1. The Development of Various Traditions of Interpreting Buddha Nature|1. The Development of Various Traditions of Interpreting Buddha Nature]] 25
+
*** {{i|Ngog Loden Sherab's Analytical Interpretation of<br> the ''Ratnagotravibhāga''|25}}
***Ngog Loden Sherab's Analytical Interpretation of the ''Ratnagotravibhāga'' 25
+
*** {{i|''Ratnagotravibhāga'' Commentaries in the Meditation Tradition|32}}
***''Ratnagotravibhāga'' Commentaries in the Meditation Tradition 32
+
*** {{i|The Mahāmudrā Interpretation of the ''Ratnagotravibhāga''|34}}
***The Mahāmudrā Interpretation of the ''Ratnagotravibhāga'' 34
+
*** {{i|The Zhentong Interpretation of the ''Ratnagotravibhāga''|45}}
***The Zhentong Interpretation of the ''Ratnagotravibhāga'' 45
+
** {{i|2. Various Positions Related to Zhönu Pal's Interpretation|49}}
**[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/2. Various Positions Related to Zhönu Pal's Interpretation|2. Various Positions Related to Zhönu Pal's Interpretation]] 49
+
*** {{i|The Position of the Third Karmapa Rangjung Dorjé|51}}
***The Position of the Third Karmapa Rangjung Dorjé 51
+
*** {{i|The Position of Dölpopa Sherab Gyaltsen|75}}
***The Position of Dölpopa Sherab Gyaltsen 75
+
*** {{i|The Position of Sabzang Mati Panchen|84}}
***The Position of Sabzang Mati Panchen 84
+
*** {{i|The Position of Lodrö Tsungmé|91}}
***The Position of Lodrö Tsungmé 91
+
*** {{i|The Position of Longchen Rabjampa|98}}
***The Position of Longchen Rabjampa 98
+
*** {{i|The Position of Barawa Gyaltsen Palzang|113}}
***The Position of Barawa Gyaltsen Palzang 113
+
*** {{i|A Comparison of the Positions|125}}
***A Comparison of the Positions 125
+
** {{i|3. A Short Account of the Most Important Events in Zhönu Pal's Life|131}}
**[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/3. A Short Account of the Most Important Events in Zhönu Pal's Life|3. A Short Account of the Most Important Events in Zhönu Pal's Life]] 131
+
* {{i|Part II: Translation}}
*Part II: Translation
+
** {{i|4. Zhönu Pal's Ratnagotravibhagavyākhya Commentary|151}}
**[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/4. Zhönu Pal's Ratnagotravibhagavyākhya Commentary |4. Zhönu Pal's Ratnagotravibhagavyākhya Commentary]] 151
+
*** {{i|Translator's Introduction|151}}
***Translator's Introduction 151
+
*** {{i|Technical Notes|154}}
***Technical Notes 154
+
*** {{i|''The Commentary on the Treatise "Mahāyāna-Uttaratantra": The Mirror<br>Showing Reality Very Clearly'' (Introduction and Initial Commentaries)|157}}
***''The Commentary on the Treatise "Mahāyāna-Uttaratantra": The Mirror Showing Reality Very Clearly'' (Introduction and Initial Commentaries) 157
+
**** {{i|Introduction|157}}
****Introduction 157
+
**** {{i|The Commentary for Those with Sharp Faculties|169}}
****The Commentary for Those with Sharp Faculties 169
+
**** {{i|The Commentary for Those with Average Faculties|180}}
****The Commentary for Those with Average Faculties 180
+
***** {{i|The Explanation of RGV I.1|181}}
*****The Explanation of RGV I.1 181
+
***** {{i|The Explanation of RGV I.2|204}}
*****The Explanation of RGV I.2 204
+
****** {{i|The Three Jewels: Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha|205}}
******The Three Jewels: Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha 205
+
****** {{i|Buddha Nature and Its Purification through the Three Dharmacakras|214}}
******Buddha Nature and Its Purification through the Three Dharmacakras 214
+
****** {{i|Enlightenment, Buddha Qualities, and Activity|309}}
******Enlightenment, Buddha Qualities, and Activity 309
+
***** {{i|A Short Explanation of RGV I.3|312}}
*****A Short Explanation of RGV I.3 312
+
* {{i|Part III. Zhonu Pal's Views on Buddha Qualities, Emptiness and Mahamudra}}
*Part III. Zhonu Pal's Views on Buddha Qualities, Emptiness and Mahamudra
+
** {{i|5. Buddha Qualities|317}}
**[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/5. Buddha Qualities|5. Buddha Qualities]] 317
+
*** {{i|General Remarks|317}}
***General Remarks 317
+
*** {{i|Different Views on Buddha Qualities|318}}
***Different Views on Buddha Qualities 318
+
*** {{i|The Blossoming of Subtle Qualities|320}}
***The Blossoming of Subtle Qualities 320
+
*** {{i|The Examples Used to Illustrate the Growth of the Qualities|342}}
***The Examples Used to Illustrate the Growth of the Qualities 342
+
*** {{i|The Ontological Status of the Buddha Qualities|344}}
***The Ontological Status of the Buddha Qualities 344
+
** {{i|6. Two Types of Emptiness|351}}
**[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/6. Two Types of Emptiness|6. Two Types of Emptiness]] 351
+
** {{i|7. Zhönu Pal's Mahāmudrā Interpretation of the ''Ratnagotravibhāga''|367}}
**[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/7. Zhönu Pal's Mahāmudrā Interpretation of the Ratnagotravibhāga|7. Zhönu Pal's Mahāmudrā Interpretation of the ''Ratnagotravibhāga'']] 367
+
*** {{i|The ''Ratnagotravibhāga'' as a Basis for Mahāmudrā Instructions|367}}
***The ''Ratnagotravibhāga'' as a Basis for Mahāmudrā Instructions 367
+
*** {{i|The Three Dharmacakras: Mahāmudrā Hermeneutics|368}}
***The Three Dharmacakras: Mahāmudrā Hermeneutics 368
+
*** {{i|The Mahāmudrā Approach of Yogic Direct Valid Cognitions|373}}
***The Mahāmudrā Approach of Yogic Direct Valid Cognitions 373
+
*** {{i|Sūtra-Based Mahāmudrā Meditation|377}}
***Sūtra-Based Mahāmudrā Meditation 377
+
**** {{i|The First Mahāmudrā Yoga of One-Pointedness|381}}
****The First Mahāmudrā Yoga of One-Pointedness 381
+
**** {{i|The Second Mahāmudrā Yoga of Freedom from Mental<br> Fabrications|382}}
****The Second Mahāmudrā Yoga of Freedom from Mental Fabrications 382
+
**** {{i|The Third Mahāmudrā Yoga of One Taste|384}}
****The Third Mahāmudrā Yoga of One Taste 384
+
**** {{i|The Fourth Mahāmudrā Yoga of Nonmeditation|385}}
****The Fourth Mahāmudrā Yoga of Nonmeditation 385
+
**** {{i|The Four Mahāmudrā Yogas and the ''Ratnagotravibhāga''|386}}
****The Four Mahāmudrā Yogas and the ''Ratnagotravibhāga'' 386
+
*** {{i|Zhönu Pal's Justification of a Sudden Mahāmudrā Path|397}}
***Zhönu Pal's Justification of a Sudden Mahāmudrā Path 397
+
*** {{i|Pairs of Paradoxes|406}}
***Pairs of Paradoxes 406
+
** {{i|8. Conclusion|411}}
**[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/8. Conclusion|8. Conclusion]] 411
+
* {{i|Notes|423}}
*[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/Notes|Notes]] 423
+
* {{i|Table of Tibetan Transliteration|555}}
*[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/Table of Tibetan Transliteration|Table of Tibetan Transliteration]] 555
+
* {{i|Bibliography|565}}
*[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/Bibliography|Bibliography]] 565
+
* {{i|Subject Index|589}}
*[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/Subject Index|Subject Index]] 589
+
* {{i|Indian Text Index|607}}
*[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}/Indian Text Index|Indian Text Index]] 607
 
 
 
<noinclude>{{DRL subpage basecategories}}
 
 
 
</noinclude>
 
 
|AddRelatedTab=Yes
 
|AddRelatedTab=Yes
 +
|QuotesTabContent={{GetBookQuotes}}
 +
|PublisherLogo=File:Wisdom logo.png
 +
|StopPersonRedirects=No
 +
|BookParentPage=Library
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 15:27, 23 February 2021

Book

Maitreya’s Ratnagotravibhāga, also known as the Uttaratantra, is the main Indian treatise on buddha nature, a concept that is heavily debated in Tibetan Buddhist philosophy. In A Direct Path to the Buddha Within, Klaus-Dieter Mathes looks at a pivotal Tibetan commentary on this text by Gö Lotsāwa Zhönu Pal, best known as the author of the Blue Annals. Gö Lotsāwa, whose teachers spanned the spectrum of Tibetan schools, developed a highly nuanced understanding of buddha nature, tying it in with mainstream Mahāyāna thought while avoiding contested aspects of the so-called empty-of-other (zhentong) approach. In addition to translating key portions of Gö Lotsāwa's commentary, Mathes provides an in-depth historical context, evaluating Gö’s position against those of other Kagyü, Nyingma, and Jonang masters and examining how Gö Lotsāwa’s view affects his understanding of the buddha qualities, the concept of emptiness, and the practice of mahāmudrā. (Source: Wisdom Publications)

Citation Mathes, Klaus-Dieter. A Direct Path to the Buddha Within: Gö Lotsāwa's Mahāmudrā Interpretation of the Ratnagotravibhāga. Studies in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2008.