Buddha-Nature: Through the Eyes of Go rams pa Bsod nams seng ge in Fifteenth-Century Tibet
< Books
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|FullTextRead=No | |FullTextRead=No | ||
+ | |BookToc=ABSTRACT._____________________________________________________________ iii | ||
+ | ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS________________________________________________ viii | ||
+ | INTRODUCTION.________________________________________________________ 1 | ||
+ | General Introduction__________ 1 | ||
+ | Past Scholarship and Dissertation Focus......................................................................................................4 | ||
+ | Research Strategy and Methodology............................................................................................................. 8 | ||
+ | Introduction to the Sdom Gsum Kha Skong.................................................................................................10 | ||
+ | The Topical Outline o f the First Chapter o f the Sdom Gsum Kha Skong.............................................13 | ||
+ | CHAPTER I-B R IE F HISTORY OF THE SA SKYA SCHOOL_________________ 20 | ||
+ | ‘Khon Family Lineage_________________________________________________ 20 | ||
+ | Sa chen Kun-dga ’ snving-oo.........................................................................................................................22 | ||
+ | Slob-dpon Rin-vo-che Bsod nams rise mo...................................................................................................24 | ||
+ | Rie btsun Rin vo che Grass pa rgval mtshan.............................................................................................. 25 | ||
+ | Sa skva PandJta Kun dgq ’ rgval mtshan......................................................................................................26 | ||
+ | ‘Gro mgon Chos rgval 'Phags oa................................................................................................................ 30 | ||
+ | Ngor E warn Chos Idan and Ngor chen Kun dgq ’ bzang po......................................................................33 | ||
+ | Nalendra and Rons ston Shes bva kun rig...................................................................................................34 | ||
+ | The Tshar pa and Tshar chen Bio gsal rgva mtsho....................................................................................35 | ||
+ | Other Important Monasteries___________________________________________ 37 | ||
+ | Sa Skya College in India_______________ ..... ___________________________ 39 | ||
+ | CHAPTER U -BIO G RA PH Y OF GO RAMS PA______________________________42 | ||
+ | Accounts of Go rams pa’s Life _________________________________________42 | ||
+ | Go rams p a ’s Birth....................................................................................................................................... 43 | ||
+ | Entering into the Religious Life and Early Studies.....................................................................................44 | ||
+ | Youthful Travels and Studies in Central Tibet............................................................................................ 45 | ||
+ | Higher Studies with Many Great Masters.................................................................................................. 46 | ||
+ | Receiving Ordination o f a Full Monk (Bhiksu)..........................................................................................50 | ||
+ | Persuaded from Returning Home................................................................................................................ 50 | ||
+ | Propagating the Teachings o f Buddha........................................................................................................52 | ||
+ | Establishment o f a Monastic College..........................................................................................................57 | ||
+ | His Death and Relics.................................................................................................................................... 59 | ||
+ | His Disciples.................................................................................................................................................. 64 | ||
+ | CHAPTER I H - GO RAMS PA ’S OBJECTS OF REFUTATION.________________66 | ||
+ | PARTI._________________________________________________________________ 66 | ||
+ | Identification o f the Objects o f Refutations................................................................................................ 69 | ||
+ | Rgval tshab and His Followers................................................................................................................... 69 | ||
+ | Claimed Followers o f Rong ston................................................................................................................. 73 | ||
+ | Buston. Shakva Mchog Idan and Their Followers....................................................................................74 | ||
+ | Mang thos’s Interpretation o f Go rams p a ’s Thought................................................................................80 | ||
+ | Go rams p a ’s own Interpretation................................................................................................................ 82 | ||
+ | Hypothetical Questions................................................................................................................................83 | ||
+ | Mang thos "s Understanding o f Go rams p a ’s Intention............................................................................ 84 | ||
+ | The Two Purities are Mutually Exclusive....................................................................................................85 | ||
+ | CHAPTER I V - GO RAMS PA ’5 REFUTATION OF__________________________ 89 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | JO NANG PA ON BUDDHA-NATURE._____________________________________ 89 | ||
+ | PART II.________________________________________________________________89 | ||
+ | Refutation o f Truly Existing Buddha-nature............................................................................................... 89 | ||
+ | History o f the Jo nang pa Tradition.............................................................................................................90 | ||
+ | A Summary o f Jo nang na’s Gzhan stone Theory...................................................................................... 93 | ||
+ | Positioning Jo nang pa School..................................................................................................................... 95 | ||
+ | Distinction between Rang stone and Gzhan stone...................................................................................102 | ||
+ | Meaning o f the Non-differentiation o f the Basis and the Result............................................................. 103 | ||
+ | Claiming their Assertion to be in accord with Sutras and Sastras......................................................... 103 | ||
+ | Classification o f Real and Imputation.......................................................................................................110 | ||
+ | Demonstrating the Classification o f Real and Imputation with Examples........................................ 110 | ||
+ | Claiming All Three Tantras to be Valid............................................................................................... I l l | ||
+ | Refutation o f wavs in which they accept the result...................................................................................116 | ||
+ | Refutation o f the Ontology: Contradiction with Definitive Treatises.....................................................118 | ||
+ | Contradiction with the logical reasons which refutes Realists............................................................... 118 | ||
+ | Contradiction with the Sequence o f the Turning the Wheel o f Pharma.................................................120 | ||
+ | Contradiction to the Intent o f Sutra. Tantra and Sastra........................................................................... 122 | ||
+ | Illustrating the Reasons o f Investigation without Bias............................................................................ 123 | ||
+ | Essence o f the Important Points in Brief.................................................................................................. 124 | ||
+ | CONCLUSION._________________________________________________________125 | ||
+ | Ascertainment with evidence.___________________________________________ 128 | ||
+ | APPENDICES_____________________________________________________ 130 | ||
+ | Appendix A: The text of sdom gsum kha skong’s first chapter on basis (gzhi) and its | ||
+ | translation.________ —____ ..._......__....___ ... 130 | ||
+ | Note on the Versification............................................................................................................................130 | ||
+ | The Text and Translation............................................................................................................................130 | ||
+ | Appendix B: Go rams pa’s writings.... — --------------------------------- ------------ 181 | ||
+ | Volume 1 ................................................................................................................... 182 | ||
+ | Volume H ................................................................................................................. 187 | ||
+ | Volume H I................................................................................................................ 188 | ||
+ | Volume IV .................................................................................................................189 | ||
+ | Volume V ................................................................................................................. 194 | ||
+ | List of his works arranged by subjects___ __________________________________ 198 | ||
+ | On the Hevaira Tantra:..............................................................................................................................198 | ||
+ | On the Cakrasamvara Tantra:...................................................................................................................200 | ||
+ | On the Guhvasamaia Tantra:....................................................................................................................200 | ||
+ | On the Vairabhairava Teaching:............................................... 201 | ||
+ | On the Yoga Tantra:...................................................................................................................................201 | ||
+ | On the Prainaparamita:............................................................................................................................. 201 | ||
+ | On the Ratnaeotravibhaea ofMaitreva:.................................................................................................. 201 | ||
+ | On the Logic and Epistemology (Pramana):.............................................................................................202 | ||
+ | On the Madhvamaka Philosovhv:............................................................................................................ 202 | ||
+ | On the Three Sets o f Vows:........................................................................................................................ 202 | ||
+ | On the Yoga Tantra:.................................................................................................................................. 203 | ||
+ | Various Praises, Prayers and Answers to some Questions ____........._______ 203 | ||
+ | BIBLIOGRAPHY----------------------------------------- 208 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Primary Sources and Translations; Sutras and Tantras.....------- 208 | ||
+ | Commentaries and Philosophical Treatises .....___ .......______________ 209 | ||
+ | Primary Sources of Works by Tibetans ____ ...______________ 212 | ||
+ | Secondary Sources------------------------------ 215 | ||
|AddRelatedTab=No | |AddRelatedTab=No | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 19:20, 28 May 2020
Abstract
This dissertation explores the evolving interpretation and understanding of the Buddha-nature in Fifteenth-Century Tibet, through the eyes of Go rams pa Bsod nams seng ge (1429-1489), a prominent scholar of the Sa skya school of Tibetan Buddhism. The previous work of European and American scholars in this field have led to our general understanding of Buddha-nature as an innate potential for enlightenment that lies within all sentient beings. The concept of Buddha-nature provides the primary answer to a question with which all Mahāyānists have been philosophically concerned, throughout history: are all sentient beings capable of attaining Buddhahood? The Mahāyāna, more specifically, Madhyamaka theory of Buddha-nature answers the question unequivocally: "Since all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature they are guaranteed to achieve the state of Buddhahood." This research has been mostly limited to the interpretations of Indian and Chinese texts and to a study of only certain Tibetan schools. This dissertation seeks to fill the gap in present scholarship by analyzing the systematic thought of Go rams pa, who set out to provide a critical analysis, explain the internal coherence, and map out the organization of diverse Indian and Tibetan interpretations of this complex idea. I demonstrate in two fundamental ways that Go rams pa developed an unique view of Buddha-nature in two ways: First, I explore the facts Go rams pa's interpretation of Buddha-nature that contribute to his unique perspective. Second, I analyze his opponents' views on the subject thereby illuminating its distinctive features in an historical context. Throughout this study, I deploy a comparative apparatus considering the different views that Go rams pa thought was wrong. Given this fifteenth-century debate, we realize that the understanding of Buddha-nature is subtle and complicated; yet this study is vital to explicate its implications. I conclude that according to Go rams pa, Buddha-nature is to be understood as unity of the emptiness of the mind and clarity which is the nature of mind.
Citation | Jorden, Khenpo Ngawang. "Buddha-Nature: Through the Eyes of Go rams pa Bsod nams seng ge in Fifteenth-Century Tibet." PhD diss., Harvard University, 2003. |
---|---|