Buddha-Nature: Through the Eyes of Go rams pa Bsod nams seng ge in Fifteenth-Century Tibet
< Books
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|FullTextRead=No | |FullTextRead=No | ||
− | |BookToc=ABSTRACT | + | |BookToc=*{{i|ABSTRACT|iii}} |
− | + | *{{i|ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS|viii}} | |
− | INTRODUCTION | + | *{{i|INTRODUCTION|1}} |
− | General | + | **{{i|General Introduction|1}} |
− | Past Scholarship and Dissertation Focus | + | ***{{i|Past Scholarship and Dissertation Focus|4}} |
− | Research Strategy and Methodology | + | ***{{i|Research Strategy and Methodology|8}} |
− | Introduction to the Sdom Gsum Kha Skong | + | ***{{i|Introduction to the ''Sdom Gsum Kha Skong''|10}} |
− | The Topical Outline | + | ***{{i|The Topical Outline of the First Chapter of the ''Sdom Gsum Kha Skong''|13}} |
− | CHAPTER I- | + | *{{i|CHAPTER I - BRIEF HISTORY OF THE SA SKYA SCHOOL|20}} |
− | + | **{{i|'Khon Family Lineage|20}} | |
− | Sa chen Kun- | + | ***{{i|Sa chen Kun-dga’ snying-po|22}} |
− | Slob-dpon Rin- | + | ***{{i|Slob-dpon Rin-po-che Bsod nams rtse mo|24}} |
− | + | ***{{i|Rje btsun Rin po che Grags pa rgyal mtshan|25}} | |
− | Sa | + | ***{{i|Sa skya Pandita Kun dga' rgyal mtshan|26}} |
− | + | ***{{i|'Gro mgon Chos rgyal 'Phags pa|30}} | |
− | Ngor E | + | ***{{i|Ngor E wam Chos Idan and Ngor chen Kun dga' bzang po|33}} |
− | Nalendra and | + | ***{{i|Nalendra and Rong ston Shes bya kun rig|34}} |
− | The Tshar pa and Tshar chen | + | ***{{i|The Tshar pa and Tshar chen Blo gsal rgya mtsho|35}} |
− | Other Important | + | **{{i|Other Important Monasteries|37}} |
− | Sa Skya College in | + | **{{i|Sa Skya College in India|39}} |
− | CHAPTER | + | *{{i|CHAPTER II - BIOGRAPHY OF GO RAMS PA|42}} |
− | Accounts of Go rams | + | **{{i|Accounts of Go rams pa's Life|42}} |
− | Go rams | + | ***{{i|Go rams pa's Birth|43}} |
− | Entering into the Religious Life and Early Studies | + | ***{{i|Entering into the Religious Life and Early Studies|44}} |
− | Youthful Travels and Studies in Central Tibet | + | ***{{i|Youthful Travels and Studies in Central Tibet|45}} |
− | Higher Studies with Many Great Masters | + | ***{{i|Higher Studies with Many Great Masters|46}} |
− | Receiving Ordination | + | ***{{i|Receiving Ordination of a Full Monk (Bhiksu)|50}} |
− | Persuaded from Returning Home | + | ***{{i|Persuaded from Returning Home|50}} |
− | Propagating the Teachings | + | ***{{i|Propagating the Teachings of Buddha|52}} |
− | Establishment | + | ***{{i|Establishment of a Monastic College|57}} |
− | His Death and Relics | + | ***{{i|His Death and Relics|59}} |
− | His Disciples | + | ***{{i|His Disciples|64}} |
CHAPTER I H - GO RAMS PA ’S OBJECTS OF REFUTATION.________________66 | CHAPTER I H - GO RAMS PA ’S OBJECTS OF REFUTATION.________________66 | ||
PARTI._________________________________________________________________ 66 | PARTI._________________________________________________________________ 66 |
Revision as of 11:47, 29 May 2020
Abstract
This dissertation explores the evolving interpretation and understanding of the Buddha-nature in Fifteenth-Century Tibet, through the eyes of Go rams pa Bsod nams seng ge (1429-1489), a prominent scholar of the Sa skya school of Tibetan Buddhism. The previous work of European and American scholars in this field have led to our general understanding of Buddha-nature as an innate potential for enlightenment that lies within all sentient beings. The concept of Buddha-nature provides the primary answer to a question with which all Mahāyānists have been philosophically concerned, throughout history: are all sentient beings capable of attaining Buddhahood? The Mahāyāna, more specifically, Madhyamaka theory of Buddha-nature answers the question unequivocally: "Since all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature they are guaranteed to achieve the state of Buddhahood." This research has been mostly limited to the interpretations of Indian and Chinese texts and to a study of only certain Tibetan schools. This dissertation seeks to fill the gap in present scholarship by analyzing the systematic thought of Go rams pa, who set out to provide a critical analysis, explain the internal coherence, and map out the organization of diverse Indian and Tibetan interpretations of this complex idea. I demonstrate in two fundamental ways that Go rams pa developed an unique view of Buddha-nature in two ways: First, I explore the facts Go rams pa's interpretation of Buddha-nature that contribute to his unique perspective. Second, I analyze his opponents' views on the subject thereby illuminating its distinctive features in an historical context. Throughout this study, I deploy a comparative apparatus considering the different views that Go rams pa thought was wrong. Given this fifteenth-century debate, we realize that the understanding of Buddha-nature is subtle and complicated; yet this study is vital to explicate its implications. I conclude that according to Go rams pa, Buddha-nature is to be understood as unity of the emptiness of the mind and clarity which is the nature of mind.
Citation | Jorden, Khenpo Ngawang. "Buddha-Nature: Through the Eyes of Go rams pa Bsod nams seng ge in Fifteenth-Century Tibet." PhD diss., Harvard University, 2003. |
---|---|