Buddha-Nature: Through the Eyes of Go rams pa Bsod nams seng ge in Fifteenth-Century Tibet
< Books
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|PersonPage=Jorden, N. | |PersonPage=Jorden, N. | ||
|PersonName=Khenpo Ngawang Jorden | |PersonName=Khenpo Ngawang Jorden | ||
+ | }}{{Book-person | ||
+ | |PersonPage=Go rams pa bsod nams seng ge | ||
+ | |PersonName=Gorampa Sönam Senge | ||
}} | }} | ||
|FullTextRead=No | |FullTextRead=No | ||
Line 12: | Line 15: | ||
***{{i|Research Strategy and Methodology|8}} | ***{{i|Research Strategy and Methodology|8}} | ||
***{{i|Introduction to the ''Sdom Gsum Kha Skong''|10}} | ***{{i|Introduction to the ''Sdom Gsum Kha Skong''|10}} | ||
− | ***{{i|The Topical Outline of the First Chapter of the ''Sdom Gsum Kha Skong''|13}} | + | ****{{i|The Topical Outline of the First Chapter of the ''Sdom Gsum Kha<br>Skong''|13}} |
*{{i|CHAPTER I - BRIEF HISTORY OF THE SA SKYA SCHOOL|20}} | *{{i|CHAPTER I - BRIEF HISTORY OF THE SA SKYA SCHOOL|20}} | ||
**{{i|'Khon Family Lineage|20}} | **{{i|'Khon Family Lineage|20}} | ||
Line 37: | Line 40: | ||
***{{i|His Death and Relics|59}} | ***{{i|His Death and Relics|59}} | ||
***{{i|His Disciples|64}} | ***{{i|His Disciples|64}} | ||
− | CHAPTER | + | *{{i|CHAPTER III - GO RAMS PA'S OBJECTS OF REFUTATION|66}} |
− | + | *{{i|PART I|66}} | |
− | Identification | + | ***{{i|Identification of the Objects of Refutations|69}} |
− | + | ***{{i|Rgyal tshab and His Followers|69}} | |
− | Claimed Followers | + | ***{{i|Claimed Followers of Rong ston|73}} |
− | + | ***{{i|Bus ton, Shākya Mchog Idan and Their Followers|74}} | |
− | Mang | + | ***{{i|Mang thos's Interpretation of Go rams pa's Thought|80}} |
− | Go rams | + | ***{{i|Go rams pa's own Interpretation|82}} |
− | Hypothetical Questions | + | ***{{i|Hypothetical Questions|83}} |
− | Mang thos | + | ***{{i|Mang thos's Understanding of Go rams pa's Intention|84}} |
− | The Two Purities are Mutually Exclusive | + | ***{{i|The Two Purities are Mutually Exclusive|85}} |
− | CHAPTER | + | *{{i|CHAPTER IV - GO RAMS PA'S REFUTATION OF JO NANG PA ON<br>BUDDHA-NATURE|89}} |
+ | *{{i|PART II|89}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Refutation of Truly Existing Buddha-nature|89}} | ||
+ | **{{i|History of the Jo nang pa Tradition|90}} | ||
+ | **{{i|A Summary of Jo nang pa's Gzhan stong Theory|93}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Positioning Jo nang pa School|95}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Distinction between Rang stong and Gzhan stong|102}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Meaning of the Non-differentiation of the Basis and the Result|103}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Claiming their Assertion to be in accord with Sūtras and Śāstras|103}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Classification of Real and Imputation|110}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|Demonstrating the Classification of Real and Imputation with<br>Examples|110}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|Claiming All Three Tantras to be Valid|111}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Refutation of ways in which they accept the result|116}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Refutation of the Ontology: Contradiction with Definitive Treatises|118}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Contradiction with the logical reasons which refutes Realists|118}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Contradiction with the Sequence of the Turning the Wheel of Dharma|120}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Contradiction to the Intent of Sūtra, Tantra and Śāstra|122}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Illustrating the Reasons of Investigation without Bias|123}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Essence of the Important Points in Brief|124}} | ||
+ | *{{i|CONCLUSION|125}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Ascertainment with evidence|128}} | ||
+ | *{{i|APPENDICES|130}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Appendix A: The text of ''sdom gsum kha skong'''s first chapter on basis (''gzhi'')<br>and its translation|130}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Note on the Versification|130}} | ||
+ | **{{i|The Text and Translation|130}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Appendix B: Go rams pa's writings|181}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Volume I|182}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Volume II|187}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Volume III|188}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Volume IV|189}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Volume V|194}} | ||
+ | **{{i|List of his works arranged by subjects|198}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|On the Hevajra Tantra:|198}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|On the Cakrasamvara Tantra:|200}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|On the Guhyasamāja Tantra:|200}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|On the Vajrabhairava Teaching:|201}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|On the Yoga Tantra:|201}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|On the Prajñāpāramitā:|201}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|On the Ratnagotravibhāga of Maitreya:|201}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|On the Logic and Epistemology (''Pramāṇa''):|202}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|On the Madhyamaka Philosophy:|202}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|On the Three Sets of Vows:|202}} | ||
+ | ***{{i|On the Yoga Tantra:|203}} | ||
+ | **{{i|Various Praises, Prayers and Answers to some Questions|203}} | ||
+ | *{{i|BIBLIOGRAPHY|208}} | ||
− | + | **{{i|Primary Sources and Translations; Sūtras and Tantras|208}} | |
− | + | **{{i|Commentaries and Philosophical Treatises|209}} | |
− | + | **{{i|Primary Sources of Works by Tibetans|212}} | |
− | + | **{{i|Secondary Sources|215}} | |
− | + | |StopPersonRedirects=No | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Primary Sources and Translations; | ||
− | Commentaries and Philosophical Treatises | ||
− | Primary Sources of Works by Tibetans | ||
− | Secondary Sources | ||
|AddRelatedTab=No | |AddRelatedTab=No | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 22:13, 1 June 2023
Abstract
This dissertation explores the evolving interpretation and understanding of the Buddha-nature in Fifteenth-Century Tibet, through the eyes of Go rams pa Bsod nams seng ge (1429-1489), a prominent scholar of the Sa skya school of Tibetan Buddhism. The previous work of European and American scholars in this field have led to our general understanding of Buddha-nature as an innate potential for enlightenment that lies within all sentient beings. The concept of Buddha-nature provides the primary answer to a question with which all Mahāyānists have been philosophically concerned, throughout history: are all sentient beings capable of attaining Buddhahood? The Mahāyāna, more specifically, Madhyamaka theory of Buddha-nature answers the question unequivocally: "Since all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature they are guaranteed to achieve the state of Buddhahood." This research has been mostly limited to the interpretations of Indian and Chinese texts and to a study of only certain Tibetan schools. This dissertation seeks to fill the gap in present scholarship by analyzing the systematic thought of Go rams pa, who set out to provide a critical analysis, explain the internal coherence, and map out the organization of diverse Indian and Tibetan interpretations of this complex idea. I demonstrate in two fundamental ways that Go rams pa developed an unique view of Buddha-nature in two ways: First, I explore the facts Go rams pa's interpretation of Buddha-nature that contribute to his unique perspective. Second, I analyze his opponents' views on the subject thereby illuminating its distinctive features in an historical context. Throughout this study, I deploy a comparative apparatus considering the different views that Go rams pa thought was wrong. Given this fifteenth-century debate, we realize that the understanding of Buddha-nature is subtle and complicated; yet this study is vital to explicate its implications. I conclude that according to Go rams pa, Buddha-nature is to be understood as unity of the emptiness of the mind and clarity which is the nature of mind.
Citation | Jorden, Khenpo Ngawang. "Buddha-Nature: Through the Eyes of Go rams pa Bsod nams seng ge in Fifteenth-Century Tibet." PhD diss., Harvard University, 2003. |
---|---|