Buddha-Nature and a Dialectic of Presence and Absence in the Works of Mi-pham
< Books
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
** {{i|Buddha-Nature as the Unity of Appearance and Emptiness|45}} | ** {{i|Buddha-Nature as the Unity of Appearance and Emptiness|45}} | ||
** {{i|Buddha-Nature as the Definitive Meaning|56}} | ** {{i|Buddha-Nature as the Definitive Meaning|56}} | ||
| − | ** {{i|Conclusion 63}} | + | ** {{i|Conclusion|63}} |
* {{i|Chapter 2: Yogācāra, Prāsaṅgika, and the Middle Way|64}} | * {{i|Chapter 2: Yogācāra, Prāsaṅgika, and the Middle Way|64}} | ||
** {{i|Introduction|64}} | ** {{i|Introduction|64}} | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
** {{i|Emptiness as the Unity of Appearance and Emptiness|141}} | ** {{i|Emptiness as the Unity of Appearance and Emptiness|141}} | ||
** {{i|Conclusion|149}} | ** {{i|Conclusion|149}} | ||
| − | * {{i|Chapter 4: Buddha—Nature and the Indivisible Ground and Fruition 151 | + | * {{i|Chapter 4: Buddha—Nature and the Indivisible Ground and Fruition|151}} |
** {{i|Introduction|151}} | ** {{i|Introduction|151}} | ||
** {{i|Delineating the Views on Buddha-Nature|151}} | ** {{i|Delineating the Views on Buddha-Nature|151}} | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
** {{i|2. Presenting Our Own Authentic Tradition|228}} | ** {{i|2. Presenting Our Own Authentic Tradition|228}} | ||
*** {{i|1. The Meaning of the First Verse “Because the body of the perfect Buddha is radiant”|228}} | *** {{i|1. The Meaning of the First Verse “Because the body of the perfect Buddha is radiant”|228}} | ||
| − | *** {{i|2. The Meaning of the Second Verse “Because suchness is indivisible” 235}} | + | *** {{i|2. The Meaning of the Second Verse “Because suchness is indivisible”| 235}} |
| − | *** {{i|3. The Meaning of the Third Verse “Because of possessing heritage” 239}} | + | *** {{i|3. The Meaning of the Third Verse “Because of possessing heritage”| 239}} |
** {{i|1. Refuting the View that (the Basic Element) is Truly Established and Not Empty|245}} | ** {{i|1. Refuting the View that (the Basic Element) is Truly Established and Not Empty|245}} | ||
** {{i|2. Refuting the View that (the Basic Element) is a Void Emptiness|247}} | ** {{i|2. Refuting the View that (the Basic Element) is a Void Emptiness|247}} | ||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
**** {{i|1. Presenting Scripture|274}} | **** {{i|1. Presenting Scripture|274}} | ||
**** {{i|2. Establishing the Reason for That Being the Way It Is|279}} | **** {{i|2. Establishing the Reason for That Being the Way It Is|279}} | ||
| − | *** {{i|2. The Wheels of Doctrine Indicated in the Dhāraṇīśvararājaparipṛcchā| 289}} | + | *** {{i|2. The Wheels of Doctrine Indicated in the Dhāraṇīśvararājaparipṛcchā|289}} |
**** {{i|1. Presenting Scripture|289}} | **** {{i|1. Presenting Scripture|289}} | ||
**** {{i|2. Establishing (the Reason for That Being) the Way It Is|293}} | **** {{i|2. Establishing (the Reason for That Being) the Way It Is|293}} | ||
Revision as of 16:15, 6 June 2019
Abstract
This dissertation addresses the relationship between metaphysical presence and absence (emptiness) in Buddhism through a focus on the Nying-ma tradition as articulated in the works of Mi-pham ( 'ju mi pham rgya mtsho, 1846-1912), a great synthesizer of Buddhist doctrine and Nying-ma philosophy. I draw widely from his writings on Yogācāra, Madhyamaka, and tantra to discuss the significance of an ontological "ground" (gzhi), or Buddha-nature, as the central theme in his overall interpretative scheme. Mi-pham was a prolific writer on a variety of topics, and had a remarkable ability to synthesize diverse strands of thought. The tradition of the Nying-ma is a complex one, and there are many divergent and competing voices that lay claim to the tradition. I will try to present important facets of this central theme in Mi-pham’s philosophy of Nying-ma, and show how he uses a dialectic of presence and absence around which he discusses a unified ground.
Mi-pham was a prominent figure in the Tibetan non-sectarian (ris med) movement in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. He most notably brought esoteric Nying-ma doctrines into conversation with the exoteric scholastic discourses of his day. Mi-pham formulates the Nying-ma tradition of his predecessors Long-chen-pa (klong chen rab 'byam, 1308-1364) and Rong-zom (rong zom chos kyi bzang po, ca. 11th c.) in response to traditions of "other-emptiness," through which he distinguishes his Nying-ma tradition.
Buddha-nature is a theme in Mi-pham's work that has a strong association with tantra in the Nying-ma tradition. His affirmation of the presence of Buddha-nature as intrinsic within the ground of existence shares predominant characteristics of the discourses of tantra in the Nying-ma tradition and, in particular, the Great Perfection (rdzogs chen). The Great Perfection is an antischolastic textual and meditative tradition that consistently evades systematic analysis, and in a fundamental way is antithetical to abstract conceptual determination. Mi-pham creatively formulates the esoteric discourses that have defined the Nying-ma tradition—the Great Perfection and the tantric tradition of the Guhyagarbha—in terms of central exoteric discourses of Buddhism: Buddha-nature, the Middle Way, and Buddhist epistemological systems. This dissertation explores a range of topics within Mi-pham's thought to underscore Buddha-nature and a dialectic of presence and absence as a central thread that runs through his interpretative system.
| Citation | Duckworth, Douglas S. "Buddha-Nature and a Dialectic of Presence and Absence in the Works of Mi-Pham (mi pham rgya mtsho)." PhD Diss, University of Virginia, 2005. |
|---|---|
