Mahāmudrā and the Middle Way

From Buddha-Nature

< Books

LibraryBooksMahāmudrā and the Middle Way

 
(24 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Book
 
{{Book
|BookParentPage=Research/Secondary Sources
 
 
|BookPerson={{Book-person
 
|BookPerson={{Book-person
 +
|PersonPage=Higgins, D.
 
|PersonName=David Higgins
 
|PersonName=David Higgins
|PersonPage=Higgins, D.
 
 
}}{{Book-person
 
}}{{Book-person
 +
|PersonPage=Draszczyk, M.
 
|PersonName=Martina Draszcyzk
 
|PersonName=Martina Draszcyzk
|PersonPage=Draszczyk, M.
 
 
}}{{Book-person
 
}}{{Book-person
 +
|PersonPage=ShAkya mchog ldan
 
|PersonName=Śākya Chokden
 
|PersonName=Śākya Chokden
|PersonPage=shAkya mchog ldan
 
|PersonImage=https://research.tsadra.org/index.php/ShAkya_mchog_ldan#/media/File:Shakya_Chokden.jpg
 
 
}}{{Book-person
 
}}{{Book-person
 +
|PersonPage=Karma phrin las pa
 
|PersonName=Karma Trinle
 
|PersonName=Karma Trinle
|PersonPage=Karma phrin las pa
 
 
}}{{Book-person
 
}}{{Book-person
 +
|PersonPage=Karmapa, 8th
 
|PersonName=Eighth Karmapa Mikyö Dorje
 
|PersonName=Eighth Karmapa Mikyö Dorje
|PersonPage=karma pa 08 mi bskyod rdo rje
 
|PersonImage=https://commons.tsadra.org/images-commons/3/31/Karmapa_8th.jpg
 
 
}}{{Book-person
 
}}{{Book-person
 +
|PersonPage=Pad+ma dkar po
 
|PersonName=Pema Karpo
 
|PersonName=Pema Karpo
|PersonPage=pad+ma dkar po
 
|PersonImage=https://commons.tsadra.org/images-commons/f/f2/Padma_Karpo.jpg
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
|FullTextRead=No
 
|FullTextRead=No
|BookEssay=David Higgins and Martina Draszczyk's Mahāmudrā And The Middle Way is a study of four Tibetan philosophers from the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries who attempted to forge a middle way between contemporary doctrinal extremes regarding Mahāmudrā and buddha-nature theory. Three of the four authors were Kagyu: Karma Trinle Chokle Namgyel, the Eighth Karmapa, and the Fourth Drukchen Pema Karpo, and one was Sakya, Śākya Chokden, who was, late in life, a student of the Seventh Karmapa. The four authors did not agree with each other, all finding their own ways to steer, as Higgins and Draszczyk put it, "a middle course between the Scylla and Charybdis of eternalism and nihilism."  
+
|BookEssay=David Higgins and Martina Draszczyk's ''Mahāmudrā And The Middle Way'' is a study of four Tibetan philosophers from the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries who attempted to forge a middle way between contemporary doctrinal extremes regarding Mahāmudrā and buddha-nature theory. Three of the four authors were Kagyu: Karma Trinle Chokle Namgyel, the Eighth Karmapa, and the Fourth Drukchen Pema Karpo, and one was Sakya, Śākya Chokden, who was, late in life, a student of the Seventh Karmapa. The four authors did not agree with each other, all finding their own ways to steer, as Higgins and Draszczyk put it, "a middle course between the Scylla and Charybdis of eternalism and nihilism."  
 +
 
 +
All four authors studied were "scholar-yogis,"—philosophers who were also keenly interested and accomplished in the meditative practices of their traditions. Higgins and Draszczyk position the four as responding to the doctrinal extremes of the Geluk and Jonang traditions, the first representing nihilism of Tsongkhapa's interpretation of Candrakīrti, and the second being Dolpopa's teaching on ''zhentong''. All four wrote in an era in which Geluk Prasangika was becoming dominant, in a language that suggested an anti-tantric polemic; Geluk and Sakya authors were rejecting Saraha, an Indian saint whose writings form part of the Mahāmudrā canon. Certainly, the two hierarchs of Kagyu traditions could not afford to leave their central doctrines undefended. This perspective is true to the authors studied, but it should be noted that followers of the Geluk or Jonang would certainly not accept the label of extremism, and would—and did—view the authors' positions as intellectually naive.
 +
 
 +
Still, the four attempts at reconciliation between doctrinal poles are a needed corrective to the many studies in which the extremes are presented as contradictory; for all four authors, the philosophical binaries were complementary and integral to the practice of Buddhism. They each advocated for an intellectual inquiry of emptiness using the language of negation favored by Geluk and mainline Sakya teachers, paired with or followed by a meditative engagement with positive-language doctrines of buddha-nature and the natural luminosity of mind. The great debates of the era between Madhyamaka and Yogacāra, ''zhentong'' and ''rangtong'', analytical or meditative approach, Sudden vs. Gradual Enlightenment, and so forth, were for these authors not issues of either/or but matters of synthesis and balance.
 +
|BookToc='''Volume One'''
 +
 
 +
* {{i|Acknowledgement|12}}
 +
* {{i|Introduction|14}}
 +
** {{i|Current State of Research|17}}
 +
** {{i|Politico-Historical Background|22}}
 +
** {{i|Doctrinal Background|25}}
 +
** {{i|Navigating the Middle Ways|29}}
 +
** {{i|The Nature of Liberating Knowledge|41}}
 +
 
 +
* {{i|'''Shākya mchog ldan'''|44}}
 +
** {{i|Shākya mchog ldan and the Bka’ brgyud Mahāmudrā Tradition|45}}
 +
** {{i|Life, Writings and Influences|51}}
 +
** {{i|Madhyamaka and the Dialectic of Emptiness: Rang stong and<br>Gzhan stong|57}}
 +
*** {{i|The Three Natures (''trisvabhāva'')|65}}
 +
*** {{i|The Two Truths (''satyadvaya'')|67}}
 +
** {{i|Mahāmudrā and Buddha Nature|74}}
 +
** {{i|Direct Perception and Nondual Wisdom|101}}
 +
** {{i|The Great Seal in Shākya mchog ldan's Mahāmudrā trilogy|109}}
 +
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā: What it is and What it is Not|109}}
 +
*** {{i|Madhyamaka, Mantrayāna and Mahāmudrā|116}}
 +
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā and What Remains (''lhag ma'' : ''avaśiṣṭa'')|121}}
 +
*** {{i|The Problem of Cessation|124}}
 +
*** {{i|Contested Methods of Realization|127}}
 +
** {{i|Responses to Sa skya Paṇḍita’s Criticism of Bka’ brgyud Mahāmudrā|131}}
 +
*** {{i|A Philosophical Defence and Justification of Mahāmudrā|131}}
 +
*** {{i|Defending Mahāmudrā Views|135}}
 +
**** {{i|The Self-sufficient White Remedy (''dkar po gcig thub'')|135}}
 +
**** {{i|Mental Nonengagement (''amanasikāra'') and the Fire of Wisdom|139}}
 +
** {{i|Concluding Remarks|145}}
 +
 
 +
* {{i|'''Karma phrin las'''|148}}
 +
** {{i|Overview|149}}
 +
** {{i|Life, Writings and Influences|156}}
 +
** {{i|Madhyamaka Approach|159}}
 +
** {{i|Extant Writings|168}}
 +
** {{i|Views of Reality|169}}
 +
*** {{i|The Compatibility of Rang stong and Gzhan stong|169}}
 +
*** {{i|The Two Types of Purity|181}}
 +
*** {{i|Buddha Nature Endowed with Qualities|184}}
 +
*** {{i|On the Unity of the Two Truths|200}}
 +
*** {{i|"Thoughts are ''Dharmakāya''"|210}}
 +
*** {{i|Understanding Coemergence: the Inseparability of ''Saṃsāra'' and<br>''Nirvāṇa''|217}}
 +
** {{i|Concluding Remarks|223}}
 +
 
 +
* {{i|'''Karma pa Mi bskyod rdo rje'''|226}}
 +
** {{i|Overview|227}}
 +
** {{i|The Differentiation and Identification Models|229}}
 +
** {{i|Reconciling Affirmation and Negation|238}}
 +
** {{i|Life, Writings and Influences|242}}
 +
** {{i|Blending Mahāmudrā and Madhyamaka|250}}
 +
** {{i|Emptiness and Hermeneutics of the Three Turnings|253}}
 +
** {{i|Core Soteriological Ideas and the Role of Philosophical Distinctions|265}}
 +
*** {{i|Buddha Nature|269}}
 +
*** {{i|Nature of Reality|275}}
 +
*** {{i|Nature of Mind|277}}
 +
*** {{i|The Problem of the Remainder (''lhag ma'' : ''avaśiṣṭa'')|299}}
 +
*** {{i|On the Prospect of a Groundless Ground|314}}
 +
*** {{i|On Whether or Not a Buddha has Wisdom|320}}
 +
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā as Mental Nonengagement (''amanasikāra'')|325}}
 +
** {{i|Concluding Remarks|341}}
 +
 
 +
* {{i|'''Padma dkar po'''|342}}
 +
** {{i|Overview|343}}
 +
** {{i|Life, Writings and Influences|347}}
 +
** {{i|The Basic Framework: ''Mahāmudrā'' and the Unity of the Two Truths|350}}
 +
** {{i|Emptiness and the Hermeneutics of the Three Turnings|352}}
 +
** {{i|Hermeneutics of Mahāmudrā as Ground and Path|356}}
 +
** {{i|The Two Faces of Mahāmudrā: the Modes of Abiding and Error|357}}
 +
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā as the Mode of Abiding (''gnas lugs phyag chen'')|359}}
 +
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā in the Mode of Error ('' 'khrul lugs phyag chen'')|363}}
 +
*** {{i|Yang dgon pa on the Two Modes of Mahāmudrā|369}}
 +
*** {{i|Padma dkar po's Transposition of Yang dgon pa's Distinction|376}}
 +
*** {{i|Interpretations of the Mahāmudrā Distinction|378}}
 +
*** {{i|Mahāmudrā and the Unity of the Two Truths|382}}
 +
*** {{i|Asymmetrical Unity and Rival Truth Theories (Jo nang and Dge lugs)|385}}
 +
*** {{i|The Ground of Truth|393}}
 +
** {{i|Path Mahāmudrā and Liberating Knowledge|398}}
 +
*** {{i|Nonconceptual Knowing in the Shadow of the Bsam yas Debate|399}}
 +
*** {{i|Three Strands of ''Amanasikāra'' Interpretation in Indian Buddhism|403}}
 +
*** {{i|Padma dkar po's Three Grammatical Interpretations of ''Amanasikāra''|413}}
 +
*** {{i|Responding to Criticisms of ''Amanasikāra''|422}}
 +
** {{i|Concluding Remarks|426}}
 +
* {{i|'''Final Reflections'''|429}}
 +
 
 +
'''Volume Two'''
 +
 
 +
* {{i|'''Shākya mchog ldan'''|10}}
 +
* {{i|Introduction: the Mahāmudrā Trilogy|11}}
 +
** {{i|1a. English Translation of ''Gzhan blo'i dregs pa nyams byed''|14}}
 +
** {{i|1b. Critical Edition of ''Gzhan blo'i dregs pa nyam byed''|26}}
 +
** {{i|2a. English Translation of ''Grub pa mchog gi dgongs pa rnam nges''|34}}
 +
** {{i|2b. Critical Edition of ''Grub pa mchog gi dgongs pa rnam nges''|43}}
 +
** {{i|3a. English Translation of ''Zung 'jug gi gru chen''|48}}
 +
** {{i|3b. Critical Edition of ''Zung 'jug gi gru chen''|71}}
  
All four authors studied were "scholar-yogis," -- philosophers who were also keenly interested and accomplished in the meditative practices of their traditions. Higgins and Draszczyk position the four as responding to the doctrinal extremes of the Geluk and Jonang traditions, the first representing nihilism of Tsongkhapa's interpretation of Candrakīrti, and the second being Dolpopa's teaching on gzhan stong. All four wrote in an era in which Geluk Prasangika was becoming dominant, in a language that suggested an anti-Tantric polemic; Geluk and Sakya authors were rejecting Saraha, an Indian saint whose writings form part of the Mahāmudrā canon. Certainly the two hierarchs of Kagyu traditions could not afford to leave their central doctrines undefended. This perspective is true to the authors studied, but it should be noted that followers of the Geluk or Jonang would certainly not accept the label of extremism, and would -- and did -- view the authors' positions as intellectually naive.
+
* {{i|'''Karma phrin las pa'''|86}}
 +
* {{i|Perspectives on Rang stong and Gzhan stong|87}}
 +
** {{i|1a. English Translation of ''Dri lan yid kyi mun sel''|88}}
 +
** {{i|1b. Critical Edition of ''Dri lan yid kyi mun sel''|91}}
 +
* {{i|''A Mystical Song of the View Proclaiming the Mode of Being''|94}}
 +
** {{i|2a. English Translation of the ''Yin lugs sgrog pa lta ba'i mgur''|95}}
 +
** {{i|2b. Critical Edition of the ''Yin lugs sgrog pa lta ba'i mgur''|98}}
 +
* {{i|A ''Vajra'' Song|100}}
 +
** {{i|3a. English Translation of the ''Rdo rje mgur''|100}}
 +
** {{i|3b. Critical Edition of the ''Rdo rje mgur''|102}}
  
Still, the four attempts at reconciliation between doctrinal poles are a needed corrective to the many studies in which the extremes are presented as contradictory; for all four authors the philosophical binaries were complementary and integral to the practice of Buddhism. They each advocated for an intellectual inquiry of emptiness using the language of negation favored by Geluk and mainline Sakya teachers, paired with or followed by a meditative engagement with positive-language doctrines of buddha-nature and the natural luminosity of mind. The great debates of the era between Madhyamaka and Yogacāra, gzhan stong and rang stong, analytical or meditative approach, Sudden vs. Gradual Enlightenment, and so forth, were for these authors not issues of either / or but matters of synthesis and balance.
+
* {{i|'''Karma pa Mi bskyod rdo rje'''|104}}
|BookToc=Volume One
+
* {{i|Critique of '''Gos Lo tsd ba' ''s Separation of Buddhahood and Buddha Nature|105}}
Acknowledgement 12
+
** {{i|1a. English Translation of ''Rgan po'i rlung sman'' (excerpt)|105}}
Introduction 14
+
** {{i|1b. Critical Edition of ''Rgan po'i rlung sman'' (excerpt)|109}}
Current State of Research 17
+
* {{i|Some Criticisms of Shākya mchog ldan's Buddha Nature Epistemology|111}}
Politico-Historical Background 22
+
** {{i|2a. English Translation of ''Rgan po'i rlung sman'' (excerpt)|112}}
Doctrinal Background 25
+
** {{i|2b. Critical Edition of ''Rgan po'i rlung sman'' (excerpt)|115}}
Navigating the Middle Ways 29
+
* {{i|''Two Minds in One Person? A Reply to the Queries of Bla ma khams pa''|117}}
The Nature of Liberating Knowledge 41
+
** {{i|3a. English Translation of ''Bla ma khams pa'i dris lan mi gcig sems gnyis''|118}}
Shākya mchog ldan 44
+
** {{i|3b. Critical Edition of ''Bla ma khams pa'i dris lan mi gcig sems gnyis''|120}}
Shākya mchog ldan and the Bka’ brgyud Mahāmudrā Tradition 45
+
* {{i|''A Trove Containing Myriad Treasures of Profound Mahāmudrā''|122}}
Life, Writings and Influences 51
+
** {{i|4a. English Translation of ''Zab mo phyag chen gyi mdzod sna tshogs 'dus<br>pa'i gter''|123}}
Madhyamaka and the Dialectic of Emptiness: Rang stong and Gzhan stong 57
+
** {{i|4b. Critical Edition of ''Zab mo phyag chen gyi mdzod sna tshogs 'dus pa'i<br>gter''|134}}
The Three Natures (trisvabhāva) 65
+
* {{i|Mental Nonengagement as Unconditioned Mental Engagement|143}}
The Two Truths (satyadvaya) 67
+
** {{i|5a. English Translation of ''Sku gsum ngo sprod rnam bshad'' (excerpt)|144}}
Mahāmudrā and Buddha Nature 74
+
** {{i|5b. Critical Edition of ''Sku gsum ngo sprod rnam bshad'' (excerpt)|147}}
Direct Perception and Nondual Wisdom 101
+
* {{i|''Amanasikāra'', Emptiness, and the Tradition of Heshang Moheyan|150}}
The Great Seal in Shākya mchog ldan’s Mahāmudrā trilogy 109
+
** {{i|6a. English Translation of ''Dgongs gcig 'grel pa'' VI (excerpt)|151}}
Mahāmudrā: What it is and What it is Not 109
+
** {{i|6b. Critical Edition of ''Dgongs gcig 'grel pa'' VI (excerpt)|153}}
Madhyamaka, Mantrayāna and Mahāmudrā 116
 
Mahāmudrā and What Remains (lhag ma : avasista) 121
 
The Problem of Cessation 124
 
Contested Methods of Realization 127
 
Responses to Sa skya Pandita’s Criticism of Bka’ brgyud Mahāmudrā 131
 
A Philosophical Defence and Justification of Mahāmudrā 131
 
Defending Mahāmudrā Views 135
 
The Self-sufficient White Remedy (dkar po gcig thub) 135
 
Mental Nonengagement (amanasikāra) and the Fire of Wisdom 139
 
Concluding Remarks 145
 
Karma phrin las 148
 
Overview 149
 
Life, Writings and Influences 156
 
Madhyamaka Approach 159
 
Extant Writings 168
 
Views of Reality 169
 
The Compatibility of Rang stong and Gzhan stong 169
 
The Two Types of Purity 181
 
Buddha Nature Endowed with Qualities 184
 
On the Unity of the Two Truths 200
 
“Thoughts are Dharmakāya” 210
 
Understanding Coemergence: the Inseparability of Samsāra and Nirvana 217
 
Concluding Remarks 223
 
Karma pa Mi bskyod rdo rje 226
 
Overview 227
 
The Differentiation and Identification Models 229
 
Reconciling Affirmation and Negation 238
 
Life, Writings and Influences 242
 
Blending Mahāmudrā and Madhyamaka 250
 
Emptiness and Hermeneutics of the Three Turnings 253
 
Core Soteriological Ideas and the Role of Philosophical Distinctions 265
 
Buddha Nature 269
 
Nature of Reality 275
 
Nature of Mind 277
 
The Problem of the Remainder (lhag ma : avasista) 299
 
On the Prospect of a Groundless Ground 314
 
On Whether or Not a Buddha has Wisdom 320
 
Mahāmudrā as Mental Nonengagement (amanasikāra) 325
 
Concluding Remarks 341
 
Padma dkar po 342
 
Overview 343
 
Life, Writings and Influences 347
 
The Basic Framework: Mahāmudrā and the Unity of the Two Truths 350
 
Emptiness and the Hermeneutics of the Three Turnings 352
 
Hermeneutics of Mahāmudrā as Ground and Path 356
 
The Two Faces of Mahāmudrā: the Modes of Abiding and Error 357
 
Mahāmudrā as the Mode of Abiding (gnas lugs phyag chen) 359
 
Mahāmudrā in the Mode of Error ( ’khrul lugs phyag chen) 363
 
Yang dgon pa on the Two Modes of Mahāmudrā 369
 
Padma dkar po’s Transposition of Yang dgon pa’s Distinction 376
 
Interpretations of the Mahāmudrā Distinction 378
 
Mahāmudrā and the Unity of the Two Truths 382
 
Asymmetrical Unity and Rival Truth Theories (Jo nang and Dge lugs) 385
 
The Ground of Truth 393
 
Path Mahāmudrā and Liberating Knowledge 398
 
Nonconceptual Knowing in the Shadow of the Bsam yas Debate 399
 
Three Strands of Amanasikāra Interpretation in Indian Buddhism 403
 
Padma dkar po’s Three Grammatical Interpretations of Amanasikāra 413
 
Responding to Criticisms of Amanasikāra 422
 
Concluding Remarks 426
 
Final Reflections 429
 
  
Volume Two
+
* {{i|'''Padma dkar po'''|156}}
Shākya mchog ldan 10
+
* {{i|Distinguishing ''Gnas lugs phyag chen'' and '' 'Khrul lugs phyag chen''|157}}
Introduction: the Mahāmudrā Trilogy 11
+
** {{i|1a. English Translation of ''Phyag chen rgyal ba'i gan mdzod'' (excerpt)|157}}
1a. English Translation of Gzhan blo’i dregs pa nyams byed 14
+
** {{i|1b. Critical Edition of ''Phyag chen rgyal ba'i gan mdzod'' (excerpt)|168}}
1b. Critical Edition of Gzhan blo’i dregs pa nyam byed 26
+
* {{i|Three Grammatical Interpretations of ''Amanasikāra''|175}}
2a. English Translation of Grub pa mchog gi dgongs pa rnam nges 34
+
** {{i|2b. Critical Edition of ''Phyag chen rgyal ba'i gan mdzod'' (excerpt)|176}}
2b. Critical Edition of Grub pa mchog gi dgongs pa rnam nges 43
+
* {{i|Refuting Sa paṇ's Equation of Mahāmudrā with Heshang's Chan Meditation|179}}
3a. English Translation of Zung 'jug gi gru chen 48
+
** {{i|3a. English Translation of ''Klan ka gzhom pa'i gtam'' (excerpt)|180}}
3b. Critical Edition of Zung ’jug gi gru chen 71
+
** {{i|3b. Critical Edition of ''Klan ka gzhom pa'i gtam'' (excerpt)|188}}
Karma phrin las pa 86
+
* {{i|Response to Nam mkha' rgyal mtshan's critique of Padma dkar po's<br>''Amanasikāra''|194}}
Perspectives on Rang stong and Gzhan stong 87
+
** {{i|4a. English Translation of ''Shar rtse zhal snga'i brgal lan'' (excerpt)|195}}
1a. English Translation of Dri lan yid kyi mun sei 88
+
** {{i|4b. Critical Edition of ''Shar rtse zhal snga'i brgal lan'' (excerpt)|197}}
1b. Critical Edition of Dri lan yid kyi mun sei 91
+
* {{i|''Amanasikāra'' in the Context of Nonreferential Meditation|199}}
A Mystical Song of the View Proclaiming the Mode of Being 94
+
** {{i|5a. English Translation of ''Snying po don gyi man ngag'' (excerpt)|199}}
2a. English Translation of the Yin lugs sgrog pa Ita ba’i mgur 95
+
** {{i|5b. Critical Edition of ''Snying po don gyi man ngag'' (excerpt)|201}}
2b. Critical Edition of the Yin lugs sgrog pa Ita ba ’i mgur 98
+
* {{i|Bibliography|202}}
A Vajra Song 100
+
* {{i|Abbreviations of Canonical Collections, Journals, and Online Sources|202}}
3a. English Translation of the Rdo rje mgur 100
+
* {{i|Primary Sources: Indian Works|202}}
3b. Critical Edition of the Rdo rje mgur 102
+
* {{i|Primary Sources: Tibetan Works|207}}
Karma pa Mi bskyod rdo rje 104
+
* {{i|Secondary Sources|218}}
Critique of ‘Gos Lo tsd ba’s Separation of Buddhahood and Buddha Nature 105
+
* {{i|Index|232}}
1a. English Translation of Rgan po’i rlung sman (excerpt) 105
 
1b. Critical Edition of Rgan po’i rlung sman (excerpt) 109
 
Some Criticisms of Shākya mchog ldan’s Buddha Nature Epistemology 111
 
2a. English Translation of Rgan po ’i rlung sman (excerpt) 112
 
2b. Critical Edition of Rgan po’i rlung sman (excerpt) 115
 
Two Minds in One Person? A Reply to the Queries of Bla ma khams pa 117
 
3a. English Translation of Bla ma khams pa ’i dris lan mi gcig sems gnyis 118
 
3b. Critical Edition of Bla ma khams pa’i dris lan mi gcig sems gnyis 120
 
A Trove Containing Myriad Treasures of Profound Mahāmudrā 122
 
4a. English Translation of Zab mo phyag chen gyi mdzod sna tshogs ’dus pa’i gter 123
 
4b. Critical Edition of Zab mo phyag chen gyi mdzod sna tshogs ’dus pa’i gter 134
 
Mental Nonengagement as Unconditioned Mental Engagement 143
 
5a. English Translation of Sku gsum ngo sprod rnam bshad (excerpt) 144
 
5b. Critical Edition of Sku gsum ngo sprod rnam bshad (excerpt) 147
 
Amanasikāra, Emptiness, and the Tradition of Heshang Moheyan 150
 
6a. English Translation of Dgongs gcig ’grel pa VI (excerpt) 151
 
6b. Critical Edition of Dgongs gcig ’grel pa VI (excerpt) 153
 
Padma dkar po 156
 
Distinguishing Gnas lugs phyag chen and ’Khrul lugs phyag chen 157
 
1a. English Translation of Phyag chen rgyal ba’i gan mdzod (excerpt) 157
 
1b. Critical Edition of Phyag chen rgyal ba’i gan mdzod (excerpt) 168
 
Three Grammatical Interpretations of Amanasikāra 175
 
2b. Critical Edition of Phyag chen rgyal ba’i gan mdzod (excerpt) 176
 
Refuting Sa pan’s Equation of Mahāmudrā with Heshang’s Chan Meditation 179
 
3a. English Translation of Klan ka gzhom pa’i gtam (excerpt) 180
 
3b. Critical Edition of Klan ka gzhom pa ’i gtam (excerpt) 188
 
Response to Nam mkha’ rgyal mtshan’s critique of Padma dkar po’s Amanasikāra 194
 
4a. English Translation of Shar rtse zhal snga’i brgal lan (excerpt) 195
 
4b. Critical Edition of Shar rtse zhal snga’i brgal lan (excerpt) 197
 
Amanasikāra in the Context of Nonreferential Meditation 199
 
5a. English Translation of Snying po don gyi man ngag (excerpt) 199
 
5b. Critical Edition of Snying po don gyi man ngag (excerpt) 201
 
Bibliography 202
 
Abbreviations of Canonical Collections, Journals, and Online Sources 202
 
Primary Sources: Indian Works 202
 
Primary Sources: Tibetan Works 207
 
Secondary Sources 218
 
Index 232
 
 
|AddRelatedTab=Yes
 
|AddRelatedTab=Yes
 +
|QuotesTabContent={{GetBookQuotes}}
 +
|PublisherLogo=File:Wstb logo.png
 +
|PostStatus=Needs Final Review
 +
|StopPersonRedirects=No
 +
|BookParentPage=Secondary Sources
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 19:09, 6 October 2020

Mahāmudrā and the Middle Way
Book
Book

This two-volume publication explores the complex philosophy of Mahāmudrā that developed in Tibetan Dwags po Bka’ brgyud traditions between the 15th and 16th centuries CE. It examines the attempts to articulate and defend Bka’ brgyud views and practices by four leading post-classical thinkers: (1) Shākya mchog ldan (1423‒1507), a celebrated yet controversial Sa skya scholar who developed a strong affiliation with the Karma Bka’ brgyud Mahāmudrā tradition in the last half of his life, (2) Karma phrin las Phyogs las rnam rgyal (1456‒1539), a renowned Karma Bka’ brgyud scholar-yogin and tutor to the Eighth Karma pa, (3) the Eighth Karma pa himself, Mi bskyod rdo rje (1507‒1554), who was among the most erudite and influential scholar-hierarchs of his generation, (4) and Padma dkar po (1527‒1592), Fourth ’Brug chen of the ’Brug pa Bka’ brgyud lineage who is generally acknowledged as its greatest scholar and systematizer. It is an important academic work published in the Vienna series WSTB and is divided into two volumes: the first offers a detailed philosophical analysis of the authors’ principal views and justifications of Mahāmudrā against the background of Indian and Tibetan Buddhist doctrines on mind, emptiness and buddha nature; the second comprises an annotated anthology of their seminal writings on Mahāmudrā accompanied by critical editions and introductions. These two volumes are the result of research that was generously funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) from 2012 to 2015 under the supervision of Prof. Klaus-Dieter Mathes. The project was entitled “‘Emptiness of Other’ (Gzhan stong) in the Tibetan ‘Great Seal’ (Mahāmudrā) Traditions of the 15th and 16th Centuries” (FWF Project number P23826-G15). (Source: WSTB Description)

Citation Higgins, David, and Martina Draszczyk. Mahāmudrā and the Middle Way: Post-Classical Kagyü Discourses on Mind, Emptiness and Buddha-Nature. Vol. II, Translations, Critical Texts, Bibliography and Index. Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 90.2. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien, 2016.