Martina Draszczyk at the 2019 Tathāgatagarbha Symposium
From Buddha-Nature
Martina Draszczyk at the 2019 Tathāgatagarbha Symposium - 5 of 23
Video
Video
Description
Sgam po pa (1079-1153), whose way of teaching had such an impact on his disciples that the traditions evolving from them were all summed up under the umbrella Dwags po Bka’ brgyud, is well known for his Precious Ornament of Liberation (Thar pa rin po che’i rgyan). He begins this Mahāyāna manual by emphasizing that the very basis for the spiritual process culminating in awakening is *sugatagarbha and proceeds to identify buddha-nature with emptiness. On a first glance this seems to resemble presentations of buddha-nature from a negating perspective. However, in a number of his other teachings recorded by his disciples and collected in his gSung ‘bum, he is very specific in his understanding of mind’s emptiness. In his “Excellent Qualities, Teachings to the Assembly” (Tshogs chos yon tan phun tshogs), he points out that mind is not mere essencelessness, but rather coemergent wisdom which he in turn equates with natural awareness (tha mal gyi shes pa), both key terms of Bka’ brgyud Mahāmudrā. While Sgam po pa rather uses this terminology and hardly ever the term buddha-nature, La yag pa (12 c.), one of his immediate disciples, explicitly equates nonarising, coemergent wisdom, and natural awareness with buddha-nature imbued with inconceivable buddha qualities. A century later, during the time of the Third Karma pa (1284–1339), it had become standard that Bka’ brgyud masters equated natural awareness with buddha-nature endowed with qualities while simultaneously refraining from attributing any substantial quality to it. This paper’s intention is to take a closer look at the early masters and explore how their meditation-oriented approach is based in both affirming buddha-nature as the ground and goal of Buddhist soteriology and avoiding its reification into an entity with real properties.
Abstract from the Author
Buddha Nature as Seen by Early Bka’ brgyud Masters
Sgam po pa (1079-1153), whose way of teaching had such an impact on his disciples that the traditions evolving from them were all summed up under the umbrella Dwags po Bka’ brgyud, is well known for his Precious Ornament of Liberation (Thar pa rin po che’i rgyan). He begins this Mahāyāna manual by emphasizing that the very basis for the spiritual process culminating in awakening is *sugatagarbha and proceeds to identify buddha-nature with emptiness. On a first glance this seems to resemble presentations of buddha-nature from a negating perspective. However, in a number of his other teachings recorded by his disciples and collected in his gSung ‘bum, he is very specific in his understanding of mind’s emptiness. In his Excellent Qualities, Teachings to the Assembly (Tshogs chos yon tan phun tshogs), he points out that mind is not mere essencelessness, but rather coemergent wisdom which he in turn equates with natural awareness (tha mal gyi shes pa), both key terms of Bka’ brgyud Mahāmudrā. While Sgam po pa rather uses this terminology and hardly ever the term buddha-nature, La yag pa (12 c.), one of his immediate disciples, explicitly equates nonarising, coemergent wisdom and natural awareness with buddha-nature imbued with inconceivable buddha qualities. A century later, during the time of the Third Karma pa (1284–1339), it had become standard that Bka’ brgyud masters equated natural awareness with buddha-nature endowed with qualities while simultaneously refraining from attributing any substantial quality to it. This paper’s intention is to take a closer look at the early masters and explore how their meditation-oriented approach is based in both affirming buddha-nature as the ground and goal of Buddhist soteriology and avoiding its reification into an entity with real properties.
More on this recording
Related Books and Articles
Related Texts
- Thar pa rin po che'i rgyan
- Tshogs chos yon tan phun tshogs
- Ratnagotravibhāga
- Laṅkāvatārasūtra
- Tathāgatagarbhasūtra
- Śrīmālādevīsūtra
- Five Treatises of Maitreya
- Key Instructions on the Two Modes of Abiding in the Two Armours (Gnas lugs gnyis kyi man ngag dang go cha gnyis kyi man ngag)
- Atyāyajñānasūtra
- Hevajra Tantra
People Mentioned
- Gampopa
- Herbert V. Guenther
- Chayulpa Zhonnu O (Bya yul pa chen po gzhon nu 'od, 1075-1138)
- Chakri Gongkhapa (lcags ri gong kha pa, d.u.)
- Milarepa
- Atiśa
- Marpa Chokyi Lodro
- Nāropa
- Maitrīpa
- Ngok Lotsāwa Loden Sherab
- Tsen Kawoche
- Sajjana
- Bhāviveka
- Kamalaśīla
- Jñānaśrīmitra
- Jayānanda
- Śākya Chokden
- Gö Lotsāwa Zhönu Pal
- Jamgön Kongtrul
- Maitreya
About the video
Featuring | Martina Draszczyk |
---|---|
Creator | University of Vienna, Tsadra Foundation |
Event | Tathāgatagarbha Across Asia (17 July 2019, University of Vienna, Austria) |
Related Website | Buddha-Nature Project |
Video Web Location | Tathāgatagarbha Across Asia |
Creation Date | 17 July 2019 |
Citation | Draszczyk, Martina. "Buddha Nature as Seen by Early Bka’ brgyud Masters." Paper presented at the University of Vienna Symposium, Tathāgatagarbha Across Asia, Vienna, Austria, July 2019. Video, 37:27. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoMUdg40Qv8. |